NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
SJC |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Medical Licensure |
SB |
171/SJCS |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Geisler |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
Minimal |
See Narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to:
HB 145 Extend Life of Various Boards and SB 73 Anesthesiologist Assistants
Board
of Medical Examiners (BME)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Judiciary Committee Substitute for SB 171 renames the Board of Medical Examiners to the Medical Board; adds a physician assistant to the board; standardizes disciplinary language for physicians, physician assistants and anesthesiologist assistants; clarifies licensure processes; updates board duties consistent with actual practice; and transfers all functions, personnel, appropriations, money, property, contractual obligations and statutory references to the renamed board.
Significant Issues
Although the majority of the proposed changes to the Medical Practice Act are primarily “housekeeping” to align the Act with actual processes or clarify inconsistencies, the following issues should be considered substantive:
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Although
there will be some costs associated with changing the name of the agency, the
costs will be insignificant. One
additional member will be added to the board with some associated costs, but
the Physician Assistant Advisory Committee will be eliminated with a cost
savings at least equal to the cost of the additional board member.
There
will be a slight impact to revenue when the board can no longer assess costs to
licensees found in violation of the Act.
While the cost of prosecuting cases in not insignificant, by the time a
physician is involved in a lengthy prosecution they often have few resources
remaining.
COMPANIONSHIP and RELATIONSHIP
SB
171 is a companion to HB 145, which extents the agency life until 2009. SB 171 also relates to SB 73, which makes
changes in the provisions of the Anesthesiologist Assistant Act.
OTHER
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The
name of the board is being changed to more clearly identify
responsibilities. All examinations are
now given nationally. The board has not
offered an examination in years. The current
name, board of medical examiners, is thought by the public to be the agency
that conducts autopsies. The agency
receives ten or more calls weekly (often after hours so they can’t be directed
to the correct agency until the next work day) requesting information on
autopsy reports or looking for remains.
The
board has regulated physician assistants since the 1970’s. In 1997 statutory language was added for a
Physician Assistant Advisory Committee (PAAC) composed of three physician assistants
(PA) and one physician with experience supervising a physician assistant. It was agreed that a FPA member on the board
would be the best way to get meaningful input from this important profession
which is regulated by the medical board.
The
SM22 Task Force on Pain Management reviewed the disciplinary process of the
board. The provision of the law that
allows the board to access costs to licensees following disciplinary action is
an incentive for the board to find against the physician. To allay these concerns, the board agreed to
remove this provision from the Act. In response
to Task Force recommendations, the board is requesting that undertreatment of
pain be added as a specific example of unprofessional conduct.
Section
61-6-15, the key section related to license discipline, is being amended to
cover physicians, physician assistants and anesthesiologist assistants. When the Physician Assistant Act and
Anesthesiologist Acts were enacted they included all aspects of licensure but
were inserted into the Medical Practice Act.
Since most disciplinary action is against physicians, it is important to
keep 61-6-15 updated. However, changes
to the discipline section for PAs has not been kept current. To avoid discrepancies the board is combining
all discipline into one section and deleting the sections specific to PAs and
Anesthesiologist Assistants.
Another
substantive change is in the sections with licensing requirements. The requirement that each applicant have a
personal interview with the board or a board member is being changed to allow,
but not require, a personal interview.
This will allow the board to focus interview resources on applicants who
have some discrepancy in their application or some adverse history, such as an
action in another state. Proposed
changes will also allow the board to contract with a medical director to
perform the personal interviews and report to the board. Changes to the licensing by endorsement
sections will make it easier to license an applicant who has been practicing in
another state or
GG/njw