NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
|
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Construction Industries Penalty Fee |
SB |
141/aSFL#1 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Maloy |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
See
Narrative |
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
Recurring |
Local |
Response
Not Received From
Construction
Industries Division
SUMMARY
Senate Bill 141 was
amended on the Senate Floor to include a new provision allowing the Construction
Industries Division, by adoption of a rule, to require a consumer protection
underwritten by a corporate surety. The
Construction Industries Commission, in a disciplinary action against a licensed
contractor, would be allowed to attach and disburse the bond.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 141
clarifies and tightens pro-consumer disclosure requirements and increases the
penalty fees that may be assessed against a contractor failing to meet those
requirements. Specifically, SB 141
requires:
Significant Issues
Many contractors
advertise that they are “licensed and bonded”.
While it is true that a contractor must present proof of financial
responsibility at a level sufficient to cover the value of his projects before
being issued a contractor’s license through CID, advertising the existence of
bonding or insurance is misleading to consumers.
Consumers expect that
the coverage is for their project and that the funds will be available to them
in the event the contractor defaults on the project. Unfortunately, the consumer is mistaken. The
bonding or proof of financial responsibility required by CID is a “licensing
bond”. The funds may be accessed by CID
for unpaid license renewal fees, permit fees and administrative fines. The bond or policy is not intended to address
contractor liabilities to consumers.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
·
There may be a slight increase in revenue
to the general fund as a result of additional penalty fees being assessed by
the CID. This would be a recurring
increase.
·
Penalties assessed by local building
departments within political subdivisions would remain with the political
subdivision.
·
CID, as well as all of the local building
departments throughout the state, would be required to develop a disclosure
form that is to be completed by contractors and provided to owners in advance
of contracting for work or receiving compensation. This
would not be time intensive for CID, or for the local subdivisions, and
could be accomplished with existing staff.
·
As with all new administrative
requirements for professional licensees, there will be some time and resources
directed to informing / training the industry.
This can be accomplished with existing staff.
·
Finally, these additional requirements
could potentially result in a slight increase in the number of administrative
hearings for CID and local subdivisions.
If this occurs, these hearings should be “cut and dry”. Either the contractor’s license number is on
his written bid or his permit application or it is not; either the form
disclosing the meaning of contractor’s license, bond and insurance is completed
and provided to the homeowner, or it is not.