NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

SPONSOR:

Aragon

 

DATE TYPED:

3/3/03

 

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE:

Construction Industries Penalty Fee

 

SB

141/aSFL#1

 

 

ANALYST:

Maloy

 

REVENUE

 

Estimated Revenue

Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

 

See Narrative  

 

Recurring

General Fund

 

 

 

Recurring

Local

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Response Not Received From

Construction Industries Division

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Senate Floor Amendment

 

Senate Bill 141 was amended on the Senate Floor to include a new provision allowing the Construction Industries Division, by adoption of a rule, to require a consumer protection underwritten by a corporate surety.  The Construction Industries Commission, in a disciplinary action against a licensed contractor, would be allowed to attach and disburse the bond.   

 

     Synopsis of Original Bill

 

Senate Bill 141 clarifies and tightens pro-consumer disclosure requirements and increases the penalty fees that may be assessed against a contractor failing to meet those requirements.  Specifically, SB 141 requires:

 

  • A contractor’s license number must be clearly indicated on all written bids and when applying for a building permit.  Failure to make this disclosure would result in a penalty fee of $150. This fee is to be paid to the code jurisdiction or political subdivision responsible for permitting the project.

 

  • Before work begins, a contract is signed or funds are paid for residential contracting, a contractor shall disclose, in writing to the owner,  that the license issued and the bond or other proof of responsibility required under the Construction Industries Licensing Act does not protect the owner if the contractor defaults.  Failure to make this disclosure would result in a penalty fee being assessed by the Construction Industries Division (CID) in an amount not less than $500 and not more that $1,500, as determined appropriate by CID.  This fee is to be paid to CID. 

 

     Significant Issues

 

Many contractors advertise that they are “licensed and bonded”.  While it is true that a contractor must present proof of financial responsibility at a level sufficient to cover the value of his projects before being issued a contractor’s license through CID, advertising the existence of bonding or insurance is misleading to consumers. 

 

Consumers expect that the coverage is for their project and that the funds will be available to them in the event the contractor defaults on the project.  Unfortunately, the consumer is mistaken. The bonding or proof of financial responsibility required by CID is a “licensing bond”.  The funds may be accessed by CID for unpaid license renewal fees, permit fees and administrative fines.  The bond or policy is not intended to address contractor liabilities to consumers.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

·        There may be a slight increase in revenue to the general fund as a result of additional penalty fees being assessed by the CID.  This would be a recurring increase.

 

·        Penalties assessed by local building departments within political subdivisions would remain with the political subdivision.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

·        CID, as well as all of the local building departments throughout the state, would be required to develop a disclosure form that is to be completed by contractors and provided to owners in advance of contracting for work or receiving compensation.  This  would not be time intensive for CID, or for the local subdivisions, and could be accomplished with existing staff.

 

·        As with all new administrative requirements for professional licensees, there will be some time and resources directed to informing / training the industry.  This can be accomplished with existing staff.

 

·        Finally, these additional requirements could potentially result in a slight increase in the number of administrative hearings for CID and local subdivisions.  If this occurs, these hearings should be “cut and dry”.  Either the contractor’s license number is on his written bid or his permit application or it is not; either the form disclosing the meaning of contractor’s license, bond and insurance is completed and provided to the homeowner, or it is not.   

 

SJM/njw:yr