NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
|
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Health Professions Review Act |
SB |
121 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$25.0 |
|
See Narrative |
Recurring
|
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relates
to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
Responses
Received From
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
Regulation
and Licensing (RLD)
Department
of Health (DOH)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
SB 121appropriates
$25,000 from the general fund to the Health Policy Commission (HPC) to create a
process for the objective review of proposed changes in the scope of practice
of licensed health-related professionals. SB 121creates the Health Professionals
Review Act, and establishes the responsibilities of the respective health
professional licensing boards and the New Mexico Health Policy Commission
(HPC).
Any person proposing a
scope of practice change is to notify the appropriate licensing board. The health professional board will collect
relevant data and information, provide technical assistance and analyze, assess
and make recommendations on the proposal to the HPC.
SB 121 sets out the
procedures for the HPC to follow in reviewing proposed changes in scopes of
practice.
Significant
Issues
SB 121 will create a structured procedure for
evaluating the many proposed changes in the scope of practice laws covering
health professions in
The HPC notes a possible draw back in utilizing
separate ad hoc advisory committees for each proposed change in a scope of
practice is there could be a lack of coordination between the various panels,
which could result in duplication or conflicts in the various panels’ recommendations.
RLD is concerned the review
process might delay enactment of legislation proposing a scope of practice
change by six months or more. If the
change to the scope of practice impacts the overall health of the people of
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of
$25.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any
unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining shall revert to the general fund.
The Commissioners of
the HPC, at their
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The HPC notes the
budget of the HPC has been reduced for the past three successive years, and
declining staff and financial resources may limit the agency’s ability to carry
out the duties assigned it by SB121. The administrative impact to the HPC is
also dependent on the complexity and number of change of scope of practice
proposals presented during the year.
RLD notes the licensing boards will not receive any revenue from SB 121. The collection of data and technical assessment may require existing staff to work overtime.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
SB 121 defines “health professions” as those
occupations that are “licensed and regulated pursuant to Chapter 61 NMSA.” Because of this limited manner of defining
health professions, not all
health professions are included within the scope
of this bill, because not all health professions fall under the provisions of
Chapter 61 NMSA 1978. For example,
licensed midwifes are regulated pursuant to the authority found in § 254-1-3(R)
NMSA 1978.
DOH believes that clarification is needed to
define and limit the scope of the term “all professional associations and
groups of health professionals.” See, p. 3 lines 12 –13. For example, references to the term “all
professional associations” in Section 5 could be interpreted so broadly as to
include national associations, statewide associations and local associations
(i.e., American Medical Association; New Mexico Medical Society; and,
Bernalillo County Medical Society). A
confusing over-inclusion in the required notification could easily result from
the use of this unlimited phrase. For example, if a Nursing Board scope of
practice change were to be proposed, would the notification to “professional
associations” require notifying the national and state acupuncture
associations, dental associations, physical therapy associations, the podiatrist
associations, the emergency medical technicians associations, midwifery
associations, etc.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
SB 121 is an outgrowth
of a previous workgroup convened by the New Mexico Health Policy Commission,
addressing scope of practice for health professionals. SB 121 incorporates many of the
recommendations of that workgroup. SB 121 will create a rational procedure for
evaluating the many proposed changes in the scope of practice laws covering
health professions in
Currently in
The scope of practice
of a health profession may have a significant impact on the quality, cost and
geographic availability of health services.
Rapid changes in such areas as professional education and training,
treatment technologies and methodologies, reimbursement, cost containment and
the health care delivery structure can also impact the demand for and complexity
of scope of practice changes.
DW/prr/njw