NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Feldman |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Natural Resources Trustee Fund Purpose |
SB |
107 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Valenzuela |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
($332.3) |
|
Non-recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
See
Narrative |
Recurring |
Game
Protection Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
-
LFC Budget Recommendation and Assessment
for the Office of Natural Resources Trustee, Report of the Legislative
Finance Committee to the Forty-sixth Legislature, First Session, January
2003 for Fiscal Year 2003 – 2004, pp. 594 - 598.
Responses
Received From
Department
of Environment (NMED)
Office
of Natural Resources Trustee (ONRT)
Department
of Game and Fish (DGF)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 107 amends
the enabling act that created the Office of the Natural Resources Trustee. The bill eliminates language requiring the
agency to repay the general fund, from its interest and earnings accruing in
the natural resources trustee fund, for its startup costs and those of the Attorney
General’s office. The bill further restricts the use of the interest and earnings
to the ONRT alone. SB107 also makes minor changes to clean up the statute.
Significant
Issues
The ONRT enabling act was designed for the
agency to become self-sustaining from the settlements it makes with companies
who damage
Aside from the repayment issue, SB107 also
restricts the use of the fund to only the ONRT.
Under the current statute, after the agency repays the general fund, the
statute allows the agency and the Office of the Attorney General to budget the
interest and earnings to cover its operating expenditures. Any interest or
earnings remaining, according to the statute, are to be deposited into the
Department of Game and Fish’s Game Protection Fund.
The agency may be close to settlements with
Burlington Northern Santa Fe for its
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 107 does
not contain an appropriation. Enactment would have a negative fiscal impact of
$332.2 to the general fund, which represents the expected repayments.
The Department of Game
and Fish notes that any interest and earnings remaining in the fund shall be
deposited into the Game Protection Fund to support its current non-game
program, for which it budget $600.0 annually. DGF also notes that it could use
find a federal funds match for the interest and earnings remaining in the fund.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
What is the status of the settlement negotiations with
Burlington Northern Santa Fe for its Clovis site ?
For the General Electric Albuquerque South Valley site, will the Trustee be
involved in the settlement negotiations ? Is the Office of the Attorney
General leading the negotiations ?