NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Komadina |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Hot Air Balloon Liability Act |
SB |
69 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Gilbert |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Attorney
General’s Office (AGO)
Administrative
Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 69 limits recovery for injury, loss or damage sustained from the "risk inherent" in hot air balloon activity unless the owner, lessor, renter or lawful possessor of the launch, land or show site, the hot air balloon activity organizer or the hot air balloon operator:
A. Provides hot air balloon equipment and knows
or should know that the equipment is faulty and an injury proximately results
from the faulty condition of the equipment;
B. Provides a hot air balloon and fails to make
a reasonable effort to determine the ability of the hot air balloon operator to
engage safely in a hot air balloon activity;
C. Commits an act or omission that constitutes a
reckless disregard for the safety of a hot air balloon operator, passenger or
observer and an injury proximately results from the act or omission;
D. Intentionally injures a hot air balloon
operator, passenger or observer.
This bill also
requires a hot air balloon park owner to post a clearly visible sign in at
least one prominent location in the hot air balloon park. The sign shall
include a warning regarding the inherent risks of hot air balloon activities
and the limitations on liability of the owner, lessor, renter or lawful
possessor of the launch, land or show site, the hot air balloon activity
organizer and the hot air balloon operator.
Significant
Issues
According to the Attorney General’s Office
(AGO), this bill would significantly change the common law protections granted
to "business invitees".
Traditionally, those who enter upon the land of another upon his
invitation are owed an affirmative duty to be protected, not only against dangers
of which the invitor knows, but also against those, which with reasonable care,
he might discover. This bill would
reduce the standard of care that a business owed to his invitee and would only
permit an invitee to recover for damages sustained for "reckless disregard"
for the invitee's safety.
According to the AGO, SB69 is not clear with
respect to what constitutes the "risks inherent" in hot air balloon
activity or how an equipment supplier could or should determine the ability of
an operator in order to avoid liability.
The proposed language is also not clear as to whether an activity
organizer or an owner, lessor, renter or possessor of a hot air balloon launch
site would be liable for injury if the injury resulted from the equipment
suppliers breach; or whether an equipment supplier would be liable for injury
if the organizer or the site shows reckless disregard.
SB69 only requires posting of warning signs at
balloon parks. How would the general public, who may be injured by a hot air
balloon away from park grounds, be made aware of this liability limitation?
RLG/prr:njw