NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Taylor, JP |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
HM 32 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Comprehensive Health Care Study |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant See Narrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 955
Responses
Received From
Department
of Health (DOH)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Memorial 32
requests the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee and the
Legislative Finance Committee to conduct a comprehensive study on health care
expenditures, reform efforts and the expected trends.
Significant
Issues
HM 32 recognizes that:
HM 32 the study would:
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Either the Health Policy Commission or the
Department of Health usually does this type of study. The LFC has the expertise to contribute to
the study and review. A similar bill HB955
appropriates $250,000 from the General Fund to the Legislative Health and Human
Services Committee for FY04 and FY05 for a comprehensive study of health care
expenditures in
It
would be difficult to conduct such a study without appropriate funding.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Performance
implications for the LFC are significant.
In addition, the LFC will likely contract some of the study with an
outside firm, which will require staff time for contract management and
eventual integration of the work product of the contractor into the final
report.
RELATIONSHIP
Relates to HB 955,
which appropriates $250.0 to conduct a similar study.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The
study is funded for FY04 and FY05, but the bill indicates a report is due
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The health care system of
A
central aspect of the mission of the HPC is to work with other stakeholders in
the state, and in responding to HM 32, the agency would pull together one or
more task forces or work groups. In
addition to HPC-collected data and analysis, any study conducted in response to
HM 32 would also build on the foundation of information established by such
sources as the Medicaid Reform Committee and the Department of Health’s
Behavioral Health Gap Analysis. Through
these last two measures, the HPC would work to be certain that as many voices
and perspectives are included in the process as possible.
HM
32 asks for a study that will review and determine the impact of health care
expenditures on the health care industry and the state’s economy, including
compensated and uncompensated costs. Moreover, HB955 asks for a study that will review the expectations
and outcomes of state and national health care reform efforts over the last 10
to 15 years.
There are several HPC studies and
reports that could be used to lay the foundation for the study requested by HM
32. Broad studies include New Mexico
Health Care: A Blueprint for Change (1996) and Restructuring of Health
Care Financing (2000), and the HPC also has numerous annual and biennial
surveys including studies of health care professionals, employer-based insurance
coverage, household insurance coverage, prescription drugs and hospital
inpatient discharge data.
AMENDMENTS
Include a date for a final report to the
Legislature at the end of FY05.
BD/njw