NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Taylor, JP

 

DATE TYPED:

03/11/03

 

HB

HJM 108

 

SHORT TITLE:

Office of Cultural Affairs Reorganization

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Gonzales

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

None

 

See Narrative

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

Relates to HB853

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC Files

 

Responses Received From

Office of Cultural Affairs

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Joint Memorial 108 requests the Legislative Council appoint a committee of three house members and three senate members to work with the Office of Cultural Affairs and the Governor’s Office on reorganization plans for the office.  This memorial further requests that the committee present its recommendations, including draft legislation to the Legislative Council by December 1, 2003.

 

     Significant Issues

 

As indicated by the Office of Cultural Affairs, the organizational structure of the Office of Cultural Affairs has been considered and studied numerous times since the agency’s creation in 1980.  During the past 23 years the agency has seen enormous growth in museum facilities and programs.  The OCA has evolved into a diverse department of State-run museums and historic monuments, as well as library, arts and historic preservation programs and services.  The agency’s Museum of New Mexico division – just one of eight divisions – is itself complex with four major museum facilities, six monuments, the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico Press, and Statewide Programs and Education.  The agency has eight advisory boards and commissions with varying – oftentimes inconsistent – duties and responsibilities as outlined in statute.  In addition, the hiring and review process for the agency’s exempt-status division directors has inconsistencies when compared in statute, and relating to the stated duties and responsibilities of agency director and advisory boards.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Specific costs would be dependent upon the nature and scope of reorganization of the agency.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

Agency and division-level staff time would be necessary to research, meet, and plan for reorganization.

 

RELATIONSHIP

 

This memorial relates to House Bill 853, Reorganization of Agencies by Executive Order, which allows the Governor to make certain state agencies, including the Office of Cultural Affairs, cabinet level departments.

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

The Office of Cultural Affairs notes that as the agency approaches cabinet level status, it would be an appropriate time to restudy the structure and statutes affecting the agency, and to recommend a reorganization if appropriate.  A major issue within this possible restructure is the elevation of the four State-run museums in Santa Fe – that are currently a part of the Museum of New Mexico division – to parity with the agency’s other museums.  This division level status for the Santa Fe museums would then result in division director status for their directors and the possible creation of advisory boards for each museum.  This parity of division level status has also been proposed for two other units of the Museum of New MexicoState Monuments and the Office of Archaeological Studies.

 

JMG/yr