NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Miera |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
HJM 35/aSEC |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Study Educational Assistant Education |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
L. Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
State
Department of Education (SDE)
Commission
on Higher Education (CHE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of SEC Amendment
The Senate Education Committee Amendment adds
“substitute teachers” to the group of paraprofessionals whose training and
certification needs are to be included in the study.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
House Joint Memorial
35 requests that the State Department of Education (SDE), in cooperation with
the Commission on Higher Education (CHE), study the training and certification
needs of educational assistants and identify needs and resources related to
improving their knowledge, skills and status, in light of the requirements of
the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), and directs that the
findings be reported to the Legislative Education study Committee not later
than November 1, 2003.
Significant
Issues
HJM 35 requests a study that will enable
According to the data in HJM 35, New Mexico
school districts employ an estimated 5,600 educational assistants during the
2000-2001 school year, over half of whom instructional duties in programs
supported by Title 1 funds. Of the
nearly 3,000 education assistants who provide Title 1 or special education services
in classrooms, 95% do not meet the qualifications set forth in the NCLB.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
SDE and CHE would
carry out the request of this memorial with existing staff. The requests of this
legislation could be met through the P-16 Partnership between the State
Department of Education and the Commission on Higher Education and the Teacher
Education Accountability Council (TEAC).
Citing results of a
study conducted by the New Mexico Coalition of School Administrators, the CHE
reports that 56 districts are partnering with a higher education institution or
a Regional Education Center (REC) to address requirements for educational
assistants, and 43 districts are waiting for the statewide assessment to be
conducted.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
It is nearly
impossible to estimate the value of a well-trained and caring education
assistant. Encouraged by school district
administrators and their own initiatives, some educational assistants have
completed degree programs and become very effective instructors. The study conducted by SDE, CHE and school
district administrators might also consider developing career ladder avenues
for educational assistants as one of several ways to help overcome the shortage
of properly licensed teachers as well as to meet the requirements of Title 1
and the NCLB.
For example, using
training funds from federally funded bilingual programs, education assistants
from school districts in West Las Vegas, Las Vegas City, Mora, Taos, and
Espanola completed degree programs, earned the certification pursued, and were
hired in a public school district. Thus, school districts were able to fill
vacancies with properly licensed teachers who, despite the recent awarding of a
degree, were already “seasoned” classroom performers.