NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Ruiz |
DATE TYPED: |
3/2/03 |
HB |
944 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Exempt Table Wines from Segregated Sales |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Maloy |
|||||
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOURCE INFORMATION
Responses
Received From
Alcohol
and Gaming Division, Regulation and Licensing Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 944 enacts
a new subsection to Section 60-6B-19 of the Liquor Control Act and exempts
table wine from segregated sales by retailer and dispenser liquor license
holders.
Significant
Issues
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There exists no fiscal impact for the state. There are no fees or other such revenues generated from the segregation provisions of the Liquor Control Act, or the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to that Act.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Alcohol and Gaming Division notes that:
“Currently, a large number of dispenser and
retailer licensees do not adhere to the provisions of the Act requiring that all display areas can be roped off, chained off, or
covered during non-alcoholic sale hours or days. By exempting wine from the segregation requirements, display areas
throughout the store will be allowed.”
SJM/sb