NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Sandoval

 

DATE TYPED:

02/26/03

 

HB

924

 

SHORT TITLE:

Amend Resident Abuse & Neglect Act

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Weber

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

 

 

NFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Responses Received From

Administrative Office of the Court

Attorney General

Human Services Department

Department of Health

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

The Resident Abuse and Neglect Act is a part of the criminal code.  House Bill 924 (HB 924) amends the resident abuse and neglect act:

 

(1)   add that “abuse” as defined under the act includes, but is not limited to, the enumerated list of acts or conduct that appear in the definition,

 

(2)   amend the definition of neglect to change the standard from “grossly” negligent conduct to “criminally” negligent conduct, and

 

(3)   clarify the definition of exploitation of the resident’s property to expressly state that the  act of converting the resident’s property to one’s own use is exploitation.    

 


Significant Issues

 

The Attorney General states the following:

 

(1)   The criminal code must state with specificity the act or omission forbidden by law.  The attempt to add to the definition of abuse acts or conduct that are not specified and not enumerated may lead to a constitutional challenge for vagueness.    

 

(2)   The amendment to change the definition of neglect to refer to “criminally” negligent conduct is proposed so that the definition of neglect will conform to the standard established in the current Uniform Jury Instruction relating to criminal neglect. 

 

The Human Services Department is concerned that section 30-47-3 of HB 924 changes the word “grossly” negligent to “criminally” negligent and appears to raise the threshold from gross negligence to criminal intent.  This seems to weaken HB 924 and reduce negligent reporting to only that which is criminal.  Gross negligence would no longer need to be reported.

 

The Department of Health adds that while there may be a need to add conduct that constitutes “abuse,” it may be unfair to residential service providers to place the burden on them to interpret abuse without specific guidance of the acts that represent abuse.  Since not reporting abuse is a violation of law, it should be specifically defined.

 

MW/prr/njw