NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Miera |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
914 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Public Accommodations for Motorcyclists |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Chavez |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
NFI |
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Administrative
Office of the Courts (AOC)
Attorney
General’s Office (AG)
LFC
Files
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 914 enacts
a new statutory section providing that a place of public accommodation may not
restrict access, admission or usage to a person solely because the person: operates a motorcycle, is a member of a
motorcycle organization or association, or is wearing clothing that displays
the name of a motorcycle organization or association.
Public Accommodation
is defined as a business, refreshment, entertainment, recreation or transportation
facility of any kind, whether licensed or not, whose goods, services,
privileges or accommodations are extended, offered, sold or otherwise made
available to the public.
Exceptions to the
above provision are made. Theses
exceptions provide that public accommodation may be restricted when the conduct
of a person poses a risk to the health or safety of another person, or to the
property of another person, or their clothing does not conform to an established
and posted dress code.
The bill provides for
civil penalties not to exceed $500, and allows a party to seek injunctive relief
and attorney fees not to exceed $500.
The effective date of
the provisions of the act is
Significant
Issues
The New Mexico Human Rights Act, §
Section 28-1-7 NMSA 1978 provides that it is an
unlawful discriminatory practice for “any person in any public accommodation
to make a distinction, directly or indirectly, in offering or refusing to offer
its services, facilities, accommodations or goods to any individual because of race,
religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, spousal affiliation or
physical or mental handicap, provided that the physical or mental handicap
is unrelated to an individual’s ability to acquire or rent and maintain
particular real property or housing accommodation”.
This bill creates a protected class of motorcyclists with
respect to public accommodation only.
Thus, employers and other organizations included in §
Section 34-8A-3 provides that the jurisdiction of Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court (BCMC) includes the jurisdiction provided by law for magistrate courts. In accordance with § 35-3-3 NMSA 1978, BCMC has jurisdiction in civil actions in which the debt or sum claimed does not exceed $5,000 exclusive of interest and cost. Section 35-3-3 NMSA 1978 further provides that a magistrate has no jurisdiction in any civil action to grant writs of injunction.
It is suggested by BCMC that to prevent parties who file for both damages and injunctive relief from filing in different courts, the remedial actions be heard in district court since BCMC is prohibited by statute from granting injunctive relief and can only award damages.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
This bill does not
contain an appropriation. However, there
will be a minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution, and
documentation of statutory changes.
Further, any additional fiscal impact to the judiciary, prosecutors or
public defenders will be proportional to the enforcement of this law.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The administrative
implications to the judiciary, prosecutors or public defenders would be in
proportion to the enforcement of this law.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
1. Should
the word “service” be included in Section 1, Subparagraph A where it states
that a place of public accommodation may not restrict access, admission or
usage to a person solely because the person operates a motorcycle, is a member
of a motorcycle organization or association or is wearing clothing that
displays the name of a motorcycle organization or association?
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1. Does a current problem exist regarding the denial of access to motorcyclists in places of public accommodation that requires enactment of this legislation?
FC/njw:yr