NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Park |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
858 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Increase Magistrate Qualifications |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Hayes |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to
Response
Received From
Administrative
Office of the Courts (AOC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 858 amends
Section 35-2-1 NMSA 1978 regarding magistrate judges so that no person is
eligible for election or appointment to the office of magistrate unless he has
graduated from a four-year post-secondary educational institution.
HB 858 also contains a
“grandfather clause” which clarifies that magistrate qualifications required by
this legislation will not apply to magistrates holding office on
Significant
Issues
a)
Requiring judges to have a college degree
may increase public confidence in the judge and the judicial process.
b)
Requiring judges to have a college degree
may create a better sense of parity between a magistrate’s salary
($58,000) and his/her education level.
c)
Requiring judges to have a college degree
may result in a magistrate possessing better writing skills, analytical
skills, research skills and decision-making abilities.
5. There does not seem to be a correlation between educational attainment level
and complaints against judges. According
to the 2002 Annual Report compiled by
the Judicial Standards Commission (JSC), approximately 30 percent of verified
complaints are against magistrates; 40 percent are against district court
judges (degreed lawyers). Here is the
specific breakdown of judges reviewed, by court, pursuant to verified
complaints investigated by the JSC:
Supreme
Court 0.0%
Court
of Appeals 0.0%
District
Courts 39.6%
Metropolitan
Court 11.9%
Magistrate
Courts 29.7%
Municipal
Courts 18.8%
Probate
Courts
0.0%
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to the
Secretary of State’s office, they confirm residency requirements of candidates
running for office and confirm party affiliation (if application). However, if educational requirements are
changed for magistrate judges as proposed in this bill, the Secretary of State
does not confirm the candidates’
background qualifications. A
spokesperson for the Secretary of State’s office said that AOC would be charged
with that responsibility.
RELATIONSHIP
SB 143 is considered
the “judgeship bill” and requests new judgeships in district, metropolitan and
magistrate courts based on the judiciary’s Weighted Caseload Study. The bill requests three additional judgeships
for magistrate courts effective
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
CMH/njw