NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Taylor, J. G. |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
836 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Drinking Water System Financing |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Kehoe |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
$1,610.5 |
|
|
|
Non-recurring |
PPRF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$1,160.5 |
|
|
Non-recurring |
DWRLF |
See
Narrative |
|
|
Non-recurring |
Federal |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates SB 109.
Legislative
Finance Committee Files (LFC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 836
appropriates $1,610.5 from the public project revolving fund (PPRF) to the
drinking water state revolving loan fund (DWRLF) to provide a 20% state match
for a capitalization grant from the federal Environmental Protection Agency for
implementation of the Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund Act. The bill includes an emergency clause.
Significant
Issues
The purpose of the Drinking Water Revolving Loan
Program is to improve and protect drinking water quality and public health by
providing public authorities in
As of December 2002, the loan capacity in the
DWRLF was approximately $14 million.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of
$1,610.5 contained in this bill is a non-recurring expense to the public project
revolving loan fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the
end of fiscal year 2003 and subsequent years shall not revert to PPRF.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
House Bill 836 should be amended to reflect the
appropriation contained in the bill is intended as a state match. Suggested amendment: On page 1, line 19, between the words “years”
and “to” insert the words “as a 20% state match for a federal capitalization
grant.”
Senate Bill 109 duplicates House Bill 836.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
LMK/njw:sb