NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
King |
DATE TYPED: |
3/04/03 |
HB |
747/aHGUAC |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Land Conservation Incentives Act |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
(Insignificant) |
($100.0) |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC files
Responses
Received From:
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
Energy,
Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)
Attorney
General’s Office (AG)
State
Land Office (SLO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of HGUAC Amendment
The House Government and Urban Affairs Committee
Amendment reduces the allowable credit from the “fair market value” to 50 percent
of the fair market value of land or interest in land that is conveyed for the
purpose of open space. Additionally,
the amendment stipulates that only one credit can be claimed per taxable year.
The fiscal impact has been reduced
proportionally with the reduction in the tax credit.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
The New Mexico Land Conservation Incentives Act (LCIA) will permit land owners who donate an interest in real property to a government agency or qualifying charitable organization to claim a credit against their tax liability of up to $100,000 over a 20 year period.
Significant
Issues
The program will leverage public and private resources and will stretch limited funds available for land conservation activities. Local governments with open space protection programs will benefit directly by being able to offer property owners with an economic and land use choice by making it more feasible financially for a landowner to conserve land rather than sell it for development. Owners of farms and ranches will also benefit in their efforts to maintain family agricultural businesses.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD notes the following assumptions in
determining the fiscal impact:
TRD does not have detailed information on land
donations. However, the potential
impacts of the proposal could be significant.
The Nature Conservancy--one of the organizations that would be eligible
for donations under the proposal--reports receiving $80 million in land
donations nationwide in 2001. The
potential for significant donations is increased by the fact that the proposed
credits are in addition to a deduction from federal taxable income for the
value of the donation. The combined
value of the federal tax deduction and the credit could exceed the value of the
land.
An average of 56 taxpayers paid in excess of $100,000 in New Mexico personal income taxes in tax years 2000 and 2001. If only one taxpayer within this group donated land valued at $100,000, the resulting impact on the General Fund would total $107,700 – the value of the $100,000 credit plus the $7,700 reduction resulting from deducting income at a 7.7 percent marginal New Mexico income tax rate. Actual revenue loss resulting from the proposal could be substantially greater or smaller than the $200,000 figure shown above.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The LCIA will require the periodic convening of the committee established in the Natural Lands Protection Act (NLPA) in order to review applications for tax credits authorized by the act.
The Forestry Division has program management responsibilities for the Forest Legacy Program. This federally funded program affords landowners the opportunity to sell development rights for conservation purposes. There may be opportunities to link the Forest Legacy Program and LCIA for its tax provisions.
According to EMNRD, the fiscal impacts associated with the administration of the program are estimated to be $24,000/year beginning in FY 05. Impacts would include approximately 25% of one FTE (estimated @ $20,000/year) to coordinate the program and the per diem associated with meetings of the seven-member committee established under the Natural Lands Protection Act (NMSA 1978, Section 75-5-4 A.) estimated to be $4,000/year based upon a quarterly meeting schedule. If NLPA acquisitions were under consideration, the meetings would serve a dual purpose and the fiscal impact would be shared between the two programs.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Ten other states, including Colorado have similar programs in place; however, most programs have been enacted since 1998, therefore little tax return data is available. Two states have placed fiscal caps on the value of credits which can be approved; in Delaware the cap is $10 million over the first ten years of the program, and in California the cap is $100 million over the first five years. In North Carolina the tax credit limit is $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for corporations, in South Carolina the tax credit is granted on a $250 per acre basis with a maximum credit of $52,500 per year. In Colorado the credit is transferable and can exceed an individual’s tax liability, but is limited to $20,000 per year. In a few other states the tax credit is limited to a percentage of the fair market value of the donation.
SN/prr:njw