NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Vigil |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
728 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
West Las Vegas School-Based Health Clinic |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$75.0 |
|
See Narrative |
Recurring |
Rural
Primary Health Care Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to HJM44
Responses
Received From
Department
of Health (DOH)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
New
Mexico State Department of Education (NMSDE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 728 designates that $75,000 be appropriated from available Rural Primary Health Care Act (RPHCA) funding for the purpose of partially funding a school-based health clinic for the West Las Vegas school district pursuant to the provisions of RPHCA.
Significant
Issues
HB 728 appears to earmark $75,000 from
the RPHCA appropriation to partially fund a school-based clinic in
School-based health centers are normally
funded under a separate contract program administered by the Office of School
Health.
There is no national funding stream for SBHCs at this time. The Bureau of Primary Health Care, DOH
estimates the cost of running a fully operational SBHC is $220,000 per year.
DOH data from
the 2000-2001 school year reveal that 8,095 patients received services and
20,427 visits were provided. Of the visits provided, 29% were in urban schools,
19% in frontier schools (located in counties with 6-10 people per square mile)
and 52% in rural schools (located in counties with up to 100 people per square
mile). Data from the 2001-2002 school
year are pending, but should be similar.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
HB
728 would appropriate $75.0 to the Department of Health in Fiscal Year 2004
from "funds available for programs of the Rural Primary Health Care Act
" for the purpose of "partially funding a school-based health clinic
for the
A
small percentage of appropriations for the purposes of RPHCA come from the
County-Supported Medicaid Fund, which also supports operations of the Medical
Assistance Program. There is no program fund for the Rural Primary Health Care
Act.
State funding for the DOH-contracted SBHC
sites comes from a number of state agencies including Human Services Department
and Children Youth and Families Department.
A total of $705,000 supports 16 SBHCs, which
provide services to 40 schools. In
addition there are approximately 20 sites that receive funding from a variety
of sources other than DOH, including the Federal Bureau of Primary Health Care,
Indian Health Service and local community sources. Currently, the DOH does not provide oversight
for these additional sites, and they are not required to abide by DOH SBHC
standards.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2004 would revert to the program fund for the Rural Primary Health Care Act.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
HB 728 would require supplemental procurement contracting and contract management activities on the part of the Department. These activities would be absorbed within the current administrative capacity.
RELATIONSHIP
Relates to HJM44, which would request the State Board of Education to adopt policies that recognizes the unique characteristics and services delivered in SBHCs to ensure that SBHCs are adequately compensated for services provided.
The term utilized nationally and
statewide instead of “school-based clinics” is “school-based health centers”.
HB728 does not indicate which school
in
The proposed legislation indicates that this
appropriation is “pursuant to the provisions of the Rural Primary Health Care
Act”. Existing RPHCA legislation
mandates competitive application and review for funding SBHC operations. It is unclear how this non-competitive
appropriation could occur within the provisions of RPHCA.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Five DOH SBHC model sites are
participating in the Center for Health Care Strategies grant with the Human
Services Department. These SBHCs are located in
School-based health
centers in
The SBHC model seeks
to improve health outcomes for youth by developing positive adolescent
health-related attitudes and behavior.
SBHC services are planned and integrated within the context of the
school environment, enhancing the exchange of pertinent information between
school personnel, parents, and the SBHC staff, providing a collaborative system
to address the health and education needs of the student.
National
statistics show that SBHCs are popular with parents
and students. More than 70% of parents
consent for their children to use the centers.
Parents appreciate the availability of SBHC staff to administer
immunizations, provide sports physicals, treat minor ailments, and provide
well-child exams. School-based health centers provide non-insured and
under-insured students with access to both physical and mental health services.
HPC reports that:
On Page 1, Line 22, replace the term
“school based clinics” with “school-based health centers”.
Modify
Page 1, Line 11 to read, "RELATING TO SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CARE; MAKING AN
APPROPRIATION…"
DOH
suggest modifying Page 1, line19-25 to
read, "the general fund to the
Alternatively, the Department of
Health could be substituted on Page 1, line 19 for the
BD/yr