NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Nunez |
DATE
TYPED: |
|
HB |
623/aHEC |
||
SHORT
TITLE: |
Tax
on Admission to Non-Athletic Events |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Smith |
|||||
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
(28.0) |
(30.0) |
Recurring |
Youth Conservation
Corps (EMNRD) |
|
(41.0) |
(45.0) |
Recurring |
State Park & Rec.
Capital Improvement (EMNRD) |
|
(206.0) |
(225.0) |
Recurring |
Public Project Revolving
Fund ( |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Responses
Received From
TRD
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HEC Amendment
The
House Education Committee amendment clarifies the amount of student association
sponsorship.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
House Bill 623 amends
Section 7-9-3.2 to exclude admissions to non-athletic special events sponsored
by the student association of a post-secondary educational institution from the
definition of governmental gross receipts (GGRT).
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
TRD notes that in fiscal
year 2002, post-secondary institutions generated roughly $36 million in revenue
from admissions to athletic and entertainment events. This translated to more than $1.8 million in
GGRT collections. The provisions of
this bill allow a non-athletic event sponsored by a student association to be
excluded from the GGRT base. Hence, a
post-secondary institution could avoid GGRT on receipts from a concert, play or
similar activity, simply by including the student association as a nominal “sponsor”. Most of the GGRT revenue from post-secondary
institutions is assumed to be derived from athletic event admissions fees, so
the potential fiscal impact is limited.
The fiscal impact presented above assumes approximately $6 million will
no longer be subject to GGRT.
Governmental gross
receipts tax revenue is distributed 75% to NMFA for the public project revolving
fund, 15% to the Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) for
state park capital improvements, and 10% to EMNRD’s youth conservation corps
program.
OTHER
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
·
Student
associations are not considered government entities for the purpose of the
governmental gross receipts tax.
Therefore, no governmental gross receipts tax is owed on receipts
accruing to a student association.
·
Net
receipts attributable to the GGRT totaled nearly $21 million in fiscal year
2002. Most of the revenue is derived
from utilities owned or operated by local governments.