NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Park |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
558 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
|
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact (FY07) |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
$5,000.0 |
Recurring |
UNM/HSC |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Responses
Received From:
Attorney
General (AG)
Commission
on Higher Education (CHE)
Department
of Finance and Administration (DFA)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
University
of
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 558 amends statute to allow any State educational institution operating a county hospital to execute a financing instrument dealing with the educational institution’s ownership or lease interest in the hospital. HB558 would limit the right of the holders of the debt to seek a judgment against the educational institution.
In other words, this new
language means that a debtor (the state educational institution operating a
county hospital) could use state property as collateral for a loan (a mortgage,
deed of trust or other security interest).
HB558 gives the option to a State educational institution to retain or terminate the lease between a County and a State educational institution in the event of failure of a mill levy election for a county hospital or untimely remittance of mill levy funds from a county to the State educational institution. Existing language required the termination with specific exceptions.
Significant
Issues
CHE provided the following issues:
According to a representative from the University of New Mexico Health Science Center (UNM HSC), HB 558 would allow a state educational institution to mortgage a piece of property in order to allow them to secure the bond guarantee through the Federal Housing Authority (FHA).
The UNM HSC is the only state educational
institution operating a county hospital.
The UNM HSC is planning a 400,000 square foot expansion. The expansion is to replace outdated
facilities and to stay competitive in today’s market. The UNM HSC effectively serves as the state’s
only teaching hospital and Level I Trauma Center. The construction costs are expected to be
$210 million. Based on this figure, debt service costs would range between
$13.0 million to $15.0 million annually.
UNM/HSC estimates the additional cost of using conventional financing
mechanisms to be 250 basis points (i.e. difference between 5 percent and 7.5
percent) or approximately $5 million annually.
The bonds would be partially paid through the hospitals expansion (i.e
70 additional beds) and partially through the existing 6.5 mill levy authorized
by voters in November 2000, which generates approximately $60.0 million (100
percent collection rate).
UNM HSC has presented to the New Mexico
Commission on Higher Education (NM CHE) Facilities Committee a preliminary
proposal of the expansion. As the
project progresses the UNM HSC will report to the NMCHE Facilities Committee,
and then to the Full Commission. All
capital projects and revenue bonds must be approved by the NM CHE; other
approvals required include the State Board of Finance, UNM Regents and the
Bernalillo County Commission.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
HB 558 does not
contain an appropriation; however passage of the bill will allow UNM HSC to
gain preferable interest rates through federal bond guarantees. According to UNM/HSC provisions in HB 558
would save approximately $5.0 million in interest expenses versus conventional
bonding beginning in FY07.
According to UNM/HSC, UNM has approximately $200
million in outstanding bonds. Based on
his figure, if the university issued bonds for the proposed expansion at the
UNM/HSC, the existing bond balance would significantly lower its bond
rating.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The Attorney General notes the following
potential issue:
HB 558 raises the
constitutional issue of whether or not a state institution can use state
property as collateral for a loan (a mortgage, deed of trust or other security
interest).
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Will operational revenues for UNM/HSC be
constrained in futures years if voters in Bernalillo county do not reauthorize
the 6.5 mill levy, which is authorized for a maximum of 8 years? Will the revenue derived through the 6.5 mill
levy be used to service the proposed debt of the $200.0 million expansion?