NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
|
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
505 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Workers’ Comp Benefits for Certain Injuries |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Collard |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
Workers’
Compensation Administration
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 505 repeals
the scheduled injury provisions related to specific body members of the
Workers’ Compensation Act, presumably with the effect that all inquiries will
be treated as injuries to the body as a whole.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Although there is no
appropriation attached to House Bill 505, the Workers’ Compensation Administration
(WCA) indicates a possible increase in workers’ compensation insurance premiums.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
WCA notes a
possibility of litigation arising from this bill. The
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Workers’ Compensation Advisory
Council has had a process in place for several years for the review of proposed
legislation affecting the workers’ compensation system, pursuant to its
statutory mandate. The prior council had
a series of public meetings during the summer of 2002 where legislative
proposals for this session were discussed.
At the council’s request, proposals involving changes to workers'
compensation benefits were analyzed for their costs by the Workers'
Compensation Administration research staff, the National Council on
Compensation Insurance and New Mexico Mutual Casualty Company. This proposal has never been submitted to or
reviewed by either the former or current Workers’ Compensation Advisory
Council. It is the position of the current Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council
that, at the present time, it opposes this bill.
NMSHTD indicates House Bill 505 will encourage
employees to seek attorneys and increase the length and cost associated with
the workers’ compensation claims management.
NMSHTD also notes that, by removing the schedule, this increases the
opportunity to take employers to workers’ compensation court. NMSHTD also notes that removing this provision
would place increased restrictions on returning injured employees to a
productive work status and make returning a subjective matter. Finally, the department indicates this bill
will reestablish an adversarial system between employers and employees, as in
tort cases, instead of the system working for the employee’s welfare.
KBC/ls:sb