NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Stapleton |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
503 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Temporary Total Disability Compensation |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Collard |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 502
Responses
Received From
Workers’
Compensation Administration
Corrections
Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 503 amends Section 52-1-25.1 of the
Workers’ Compensation Act to entitle an injured worker who has reached maximum
medical improvement to an additional 26 weeks of temporary total disability
(TTD) compensation benefits subject to the application of Section
52-1-50.1. However, if a worker who has
reached maximum medical improvement returns to work, the employer must continue
to provide reasonable and necessary medical care, but is not entitled to TTD
benefits.
Under the current law, the worker is not entitled to TTD
benefits if he is offered work at his pre-injury wage, but is entitled to such
benefits if he is offered work at less than his pre-injury wage.
Significant
Issues
The Workers’ Compensation Administration (WCA)
notes that there are no triggering conditions, thereby providing benefits
whether or not the worker has returned to work.
It may have an impact on the motivation of workers to return to work.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
WCA indicates House
Bill 503 will increase workers’ compensation insurance premiums. The Corrections Department notes the bill would cause a
minimal increase in premium costs to the department if it fails to offer
workers who have reached maximum medical improvement their pre-injury jobs at a
comparable wage. The department would
then be responsible for paying for an additional 26 weeks of TTD compensation
benefits to those workers. There is no
appropriation in the bill to cover these additional costs. However, the department can avoid these increased
costs by making sure that it offers all injured workers who have reached
maximum medical improvement their pre-injury jobs at comparable wages if those
jobs are open or available.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
WCA notes the
possibility of litigation concerning asserted defenses to the bill. It also indicates the workload would be
absorbable by present staff. The
Corrections Department notes minimal impact on administrative staff.
RELATIONSHIP
House
Bill 503 relates to House Bill 502. Section
52-1-50.1, as amended by HB 502, requires the employer to offer the worker his
pre-injury job at a comparable wage only if that worker has reached maximum
medical improvement; the employer does not have to offer work to a former
worker who has not reached maximum medical improvement and does not have to
offer work to a former worker if that worker’s pre-injury job is not open or
available. It also would require any
employer who fails to offer any injured worker who has reached maximum medical
improvement his pre-injury job at a comparable wage to pay TTD benefits for the
former worker for a period of up to six months or until the worker returns to
work for another employer earning at least 80 percent of his pre-injury wage,
whichever is sooner.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
WCA
notes it is unclear whether the sponsor really means to extend TTD when there
is a complete recovery without residual disability. House Bill 503 has that result to that extent
the bill appears to create a personal injury-like damage component to workers’
compensation not previously in the act.
The interplay with HB 502 is also unclear.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Workers’ Compensation Advisory
Council has had a process in place for several years for the review of proposed
legislation affecting the workers’ compensation system, pursuant to its
statutory mandate. The prior council had
a series of public meetings during the summer of 2002 where legislative
proposals for this session were discussed.
At the council’s request, proposals involving changes to workers'
compensation benefits were analyzed for their costs by the Workers'
Compensation Administration research staff, the National Council on
Compensation Insurance and New Mexico Mutual Casualty Company. This proposal has never been submitted to or
reviewed by either the former or current Workers’ Compensation Advisory
Council. It is the position of the current Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council
that, at the present time, it opposes this bill.
The
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
WCA
asks the following questions be addressed:
·
Is
the worker to return to work and receive both TTD and wages from the same
employer, which is otherwise prohibited in the act?
·
Is
the worker to return and receive TTD doubly under this bill and HB 502?
·
Is
the worker who is not rehired entitled to an additional year of TTD?
KBC/njw