NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Stapleton

 

DATE TYPED:

2/17/03

 

HB

503

 

SHORT TITLE:

Temporary Total Disability Compensation

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Collard

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

NFI

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

Relates to HB 502

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Responses Received From

Workers’ Compensation Administration

Corrections Department

New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 503 amends Section 52-1-25.1 of the Workers’ Compensation Act to entitle an injured worker who has reached maximum medical improvement to an additional 26 weeks of temporary total disability (TTD) compensation benefits subject to the application of Section 52-1-50.1.  However, if a worker who has reached maximum medical improvement returns to work, the employer must continue to provide reasonable and necessary medical care, but is not entitled to TTD benefits.  

 

Under the current law, the worker is not entitled to TTD benefits if he is offered work at his pre-injury wage, but is entitled to such benefits if he is offered work at less than his pre-injury wage.  

 


     Significant Issues

 

The Workers’ Compensation Administration (WCA) notes that there are no triggering conditions, thereby providing benefits whether or not the worker has returned to work.  It may have an impact on the motivation of workers to return to work.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

WCA indicates House Bill 503 will increase workers’ compensation insurance premiums.  The Corrections Department notes the bill would cause a minimal increase in premium costs to the department if it fails to offer workers who have reached maximum medical improvement their pre-injury jobs at a comparable wage.  The department would then be responsible for paying for an additional 26 weeks of TTD compensation benefits to those workers.  There is no appropriation in the bill to cover these additional costs.  However, the department can avoid these increased costs by making sure that it offers all injured workers who have reached maximum medical improvement their pre-injury jobs at comparable wages if those jobs are open or available.   

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

WCA notes the possibility of litigation concerning asserted defenses to the bill.  It also indicates the workload would be absorbable by present staff.  The Corrections Department notes minimal impact on administrative staff.

 

RELATIONSHIP

 

House Bill 503 relates to House Bill 502.  Section 52-1-50.1, as amended by HB 502, requires the employer to offer the worker his pre-injury job at a comparable wage only if that worker has reached maximum medical improvement; the employer does not have to offer work to a former worker who has not reached maximum medical improvement and does not have to offer work to a former worker if that worker’s pre-injury job is not open or available.  It also would require any employer who fails to offer any injured worker who has reached maximum medical improvement his pre-injury job at a comparable wage to pay TTD benefits for the former worker for a period of up to six months or until the worker returns to work for another employer earning at least 80 percent of his pre-injury wage, whichever is sooner.  

 

TECHNICAL ISSUES

 

WCA notes it is unclear whether the sponsor really means to extend TTD when there is a complete recovery without residual disability.  House Bill 503 has that result to that extent the bill appears to create a personal injury-like damage component to workers’ compensation not previously in the act.  The interplay with HB 502 is also unclear. 

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

The Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council has had a process in place for several years for the review of proposed legislation affecting the workers’ compensation system, pursuant to its statutory mandate.  The prior council had a series of public meetings during the summer of 2002 where legislative proposals for this session were discussed.  At the council’s request, proposals involving changes to workers' compensation benefits were analyzed for their costs by the Workers' Compensation Administration research staff, the National Council on Compensation Insurance and New Mexico Mutual Casualty Company.  This proposal has never been submitted to or reviewed by either the former or current Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council.  It is the position of the current Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council that, at the present time, it opposes this bill.

 

The New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department indicates there is not enough information in this bill.  There is no explanation of why or how this additional TTD is or should be paid.  This bill is not necessary in view of the current schedule of injuries. 

 

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

 

WCA asks the following questions be addressed:

 

·       Is the worker to return to work and receive both TTD and wages from the same employer, which is otherwise prohibited in the act? 

·       Is the worker to return and receive TTD doubly under this bill and HB 502? 

·       Is the worker who is not rehired entitled to an additional year of TTD?

 

KBC/njw