NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
|
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
425/aHJC |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
DNA Sample Processing |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Fox-Young |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
$1,000.0 |
|
|
$0.1 Significant |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
Department
of Public Safety (DPS)
Attorney General
(AG)
Corrections
Department (CD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HJC Amendment
The
HJC amendment strikes the physical science institute at
DPS
recommends the bill be further amended to specify that any contract
laboratories must be accredited to perform forensic analysis.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
House Bill 425
appropriates $1,000.0 from the general fund to the Department of Public Safety
(DPS) for expenditure in fiscal years 2003 to 2005 to contract with the genetic
testing laboratory of the physical science institute at
Unprocessed DNA
samples of the Corrections Department (CD), the state crime laboratory and
other state and local law enforcement agencies may be processed pursuant to
this appropriation.
The bill contains an
emergency appropriation.
Significant Issues
The Attorney General
(AG) and the Department of Public Safety (DPS) report that the NMSU
genetic testing laboratory is not accredited
to perform forensic testing of
DNA samples. Accreditation is required
by the federal DNA Advisory Board. AG
indicates that any results obtained during the testing would be subject to
challenge during any criminal proceeding and would likely be inadmissible.
DPS notes that
The appropriation of $1,000.0 contained in this
bill is a recurring expense. Any
unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2005
shall revert to the general fund.
A backlog of unprocessed DNA samples is in all
of the agencies mentioned in the bill.
Any appropriation directed at processing any portion of these samples is
a recurring expense, as the state’s current resources are insufficient to keep
pace with the growing pool of samples.
The act of earmarking funds for a specific
laboratory may have the unintended effect of decreasing efficiency because it
limits competition.