NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Marquardt

 

DATE TYPED:

2/18/03

 

HB

410

 

SHORT TITLE:

Gross Receipts Tax Credit For Physicians

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Smith

 

REVENUE

 

Estimated Revenue

Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

 

(63,500.0)

(63,500.0)

Recurring

General Fund

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)

 

Duplicates HB-163, HB-286, SB-305

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Responses Received From

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 410 would provide credits for state and local gross receipts taxes paid by licensed physicians, dentists, optometrists and osteopaths. The credits would be allowed for gross receipts taxes paid by pass-through entities – in proportion to the degree of pass-through entity owned by each physician. The proposed credits would be refundable, i.e. if credits exceed taxpayers’ income tax liability, the excess would be refunded. The credits could be claimed against personal or corporate income tax obligations

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

TRD notes that the fiscal impact reflects the current forecast of gross receipts obligations of physicians, dentists, optometrists and osteopaths.  The forecast is based on reported liabilities of these taxpayers in recent years.  Amounts would increase by approximately 6 percent per year – in proportion to forecast increases in gross receipts obligations. 


TECHNICAL ISSUES

 

On page 2, line 3, the phrase “gross receipts” should be added immediately before the word “taxes” in order to identify the type of taxes

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

TRD notes that the proposal provides gross receipts tax relief for certain taxpayers through the income tax code.  This is an indirect and potentially inefficient means of providing such relief.  State income taxes are a deductible item for federal income tax purposes.  Thus, a significant portion of the benefits of the tax reduction—as much as 38.6% depending on the applicable effective tax rates--would accrue to the federal government in the form of increased income tax collections.

 

SS/njw