NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Martinez |
DATE TYPED: |
2/18/03 |
HB |
401 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Uniform Athlete Agents Act |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Maloy |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
$170.0 See Narrative |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
See
Narrative |
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
Responses
Received From
Secretary
of State’s Office
SUMMARY
House Bill 401
requires that any person seeking to act as an agent on behalf of a student
athlete must register as such an agent with the Secretary of State’s
Office. The bill sets forth the program
requirements, including registration requirements, fees, required student –
agent contract content, students’ rights, and criminal and civil penalties.
Violation of the act
constitutes a misdemeanor, and gives rise to civil damages against the agent
and/or the student in the event an educational institute is harmed.
Significant
Issues
a.
conviction of a crime
involving moral turpitude or a felony,
b.
having made materially
false, misleading, deceptive or fraudulent representations in applying for
registration or as an agent,
c.
having engaged in
conduct that would disqualify the individual from serving in a fiduciary
capacity,
d.
revocation of agent
registration in another state,
e.
having engaged in
conduct that resulted in a sanction against participation in an interscholastic
or intercollegiate athletic event, and
f.
having engaged in
conduct adversely reflecting on the applicant’s credibility, honesty or
integrity.
While the intent of this section is to provide
criteria by which the secretary of state may determine if someone is unfit to
represent the interests of a student athlete, many of the criteria are of such
a nature that they will likely give rise to significant legal challenges.
a.
the amount and method
of calculating the consideration to be paid by the student athlete for
services,
b.
a listing of any
persons who will be compensated because of the student – agent contract,
c.
a description of any
expenses the student is agreeing to reimburse,
d.
a description of the
agent services to be provided,
e.
the date of execution
and the duration of the contract, and
f.
within close proximity
to the signature of the student athlete, a conspicuous notice in boldface type
and capital letters stating:
WARNING TO STUDENT ATHLETE:
IF YOU SIGN THIS CONTRACT:
(1)
YOU MAY LOSE YOUR
ELIGIBILITY TO COMPETE AS A STUDENT ATHLETE IN YOUR SPORT;
(2)
IF YOU HAVE AN
ATHLETIC DIRECTOR, WITHIN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS AFTER ENTERING INTO THIS CONTRACT,
BOTH YOU AND YOUR ATHLETE AGENT MUST NOTIFY YOUR ATHLETIC DIRECTOR; AND
(3)
YOU MAY CANCEL THIS
CONTRACT WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER SIGNING IT. CONCELLATION OF THIS CONTRACT MAY NOT REINSTATE YOU
ELIGIBILITY.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
It is not believed that the revenue to be generated through this
program’s fees will be significant. It
is doubtful there will be many registrants.
Also, the fee schedule is low:
$20.00
for initial application for registration
$10.00 for an application for registration based on licensure in
another state
$20.00 for application for renewal
$10.00 for application for renewal based on licensure in
another state
This revenue will go to the general fund and will be recurring.
The Secretary of State’s Office already registers numerous types of legal
relationships. Seemingly, addition of
this registration would not be significant.
However, the Secretary of State’s Office estimates implementation of this
program will require an appropriation of
$170.0. The office states that
two additional FTE are needed, an attorney and a legal secretary are
needed. The office expresses concern
regarding the need to conduct background investigations, subpoenas,
hearings, and possible revocations.
With regard to the
“legal concerns” expressed by the office, most such matters are not handled by
the agencies themselves. Rather, the
Secretary of State’s Office is represented by designated counsel through the
Attorney General’s Office.
TECHNICAL ISSUES:
The Secretary of
State’s Office has offered the following technical concerns:
1) Section
3 provides that the Secretary of State is appointed as the agent for service of
process for nonresident athlete agents.
A conflict of interest may arise in a situation where the Secretary of
State is recognized as the agent for service of process for an athlete agent
and must also subpoena records from the athlete agent and possibly hold a
hearing, assess a penalty or revoke the athlete agent’s registration.
2) Sections
5 and 6 provide for a registration process and a certificate of registration
from the Secretary of State. The bill
does not stipulate the duration that a registration is effective (i.e., one
year, two years).
3) Section
6(D) provides for an athlete agent to apply to renew his registration. The bill does not stipulate the length of
time that an athlete agent’s renewal is effective (i.e., one year, two
years). Further, the bill does not
require an athlete agent to apply for renewal of his registration during a certain
period (i.e., thirty days or sixty days prior to the expiration of registration).
4) Section
8 provides for a temporary certificate of registration. The bill does not prescribe the length of
time for a temporary registration (i.e., sixty days, ninety days, etc.).
In response to the
concerns expressed by the Secretary of State’s Office, the following suggestion
is provided:
Addition
of a grant of rule making authority through which the Secretary of State’s Office
may administratively address some of the concerns outlined immediately
above. Many of the office’s concerns
should not be included in a statute, as the office itself is better able to
determine registration terms, etc. that are consistent with the office’s operational
needs.
ALTERNATIVES
This program may better fit with the Athletic Commission (Regulation & Licensing Department). However, in considering such an option, it is noted that the Commission keeps the revenue it generates. Fees paid to the Commission are OSF and do not come to the general fund.
SJM/prr