NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Heaton |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
359 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Long Term Care Insurance Premiums Tax Credit |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
($6,000.0) |
($6,000.0) |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to
SB-337, Long Term Care Insurance Premiums Tax
Credit
LFC files
Responses
Received From:
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
Human
Services Department (HSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Significant
Issues
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) provided for favorable tax treatment of premiums and benefits for Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance Policies. HIPAA clarified that such qualified policies would be treated as Accident and Health Insurance under the Internal Revenue Code. If the LTC insurance policy is qualified, per diem benefits are excludible from federal taxable income up to $200.00 per day for 2001, and $210.00 per day for 2002.
Since Medicaid is
one of the fastest growing items in state budgets, 35 state legislatures have approved
tax incentives for long-term care insurance (Health Insurance Association of
America publication-Sep2002).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
According to TRD aggregate data on long-term care
premiums is not readily available to allow a precise estimate of the proposed
measure’s impacts therefore the following assumptions were made:
·
annual long-term health premiums average
$3,000;
·
proposed measure would allow a maximum credit
of $750 per return; and
·
8,000 taxpayers--about one percent of all
The resulting fiscal impact on the General Fund
would total $6 million (i.e., $750 x 8,000). This estimate is consistent with
information that about 10 percent of the nation’s elderly purchase long-term
care insurance, according to the American Council of Life Insurers. Other industry sources say the figure might
be as high as 3 percent, however, and is rising due, among other things, to
federal tax advantages associated with purchasing long-term care insurance. The
figure shown above should therefore be viewed as approximate.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Administrative
impacts imposed on TRD would be relatively modest and could be accomplished
with existing resources.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The HPC provided the
following background information:
·
HB359 creates an incentive, though a
partial tax credit, to purchase long-term care insurance. With a quarter of the
cost of the insurance covered by the credit, it may become more affordable to
purchase long-term care insurance at a time when families are spending down
assets to become Medicaid eligible and when the Medicaid resources of the State
of New Mexico are being stretched.
· If the number of individuals with private long-term care insurance grows, the demand for
publicly
financed care should decline, if other factors do not change.
·
The Underwriter's Long Term Care Council
notes “ the chance of eventually needing some sort of long-term care is 1 in 2,
while the cost of long-term care services--$50,000 to $100,000 a year is expected
to triple by 2020.”
·
An American Council of Life Insurance report in
May 2000 notes that the Congressional
Budget Office had concluded that “private
long term care insurance could save the federal government about $40
billion in Medicaid costs.”