NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Vaughn |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
341 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Children & Crimes Against Household
Members |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Fox-Young |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
$0.1 Significant |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
Administrative
Office of the Courts (AOC)
Corrections
Department (CD)
Administrative
Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
Attorney
General (AG)
Public
Defender Department (PDD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 341 amends
Section
“Child
means a minor under the age of thirteen.”
Significant
Issues
The Administrative Office of
the District Attorneys (AODA) notes that "presence of a child" should
be defined. It is not clear whether the
child must merely be present, within sight or sound of the incident or
cognizant of the perpetrator’s actions.
AODA indicates that it is unclear whether the presence of a sleeping
child or the presence an infant qualifies an offender for the new penalties.
The Public Defender Department (PDD) notes that a huge number of domestic abuse incidents happen in the presence of a child, meaning that the bill will likely have an immediate and significant effect on the department’s clients and their families. PDD notes that the provisions of the bill will likely increase the number of children who act as witnesses.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
PDD indicates that increased attorney time and ever-burgeoning trial dockets will drive up the costs associated with in-house attorneys and contract counsel throughout the state. PDD estimates an increase of $166.0 for in-house counsel and a parallel increase in contract attorney fees. Additionally, the bill will likely have a significant fiscal impact on prosecutors and on the courts.
AOC notes that if the trial rate increases
significantly as a result of the provisions of the bill, courts may need
additional personnel to manage the caseload.
The Corrections Department (CD) notes that the bill will
likely result in increased costs to the department, as a number of domestic
violence offenders will be serving longer terms. CD further notes that the longer terms of
supervision of offenders on probation and/or parole will likely prompt a slight
increase in administrative costs.
JCF/njw