NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Crook |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
146/aHENRC/aHTRC |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Expand Renewable Energy Tax Credit |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
($75.0) |
Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC files
US Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Public Regulatory Commission (PRC)
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department
(EMNRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HTRC Amendment
The House Taxation and Revenue Committee
amendment:
Synopsis
of HENRC Amendment
Synopsis
of Original Bill
House Bill 146 changes the Renewable Energy
Production Credit adopted last year (Laws 2002, chapter 59). The credit is equal to $0.01 per kilowatt-hour
for the first 400 thousand megawatt hours of power supplied per taxpayer per
year. The credit may be taken against
the taxpayer’s corporate income tax liability.
Proposed changes include:
Taxpayers are eligible
for the tax credit for ten consecutive years, beginning when the qualified
energy generator begins producing electricity.
A qualified energy generator must operate a facility with at least 20
megawatts generating capacity in
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD
notes the near-term impact of the proposal is limited by the small number and
capacity of eligible facilities in the state.
At present there are only a small number of eligible facilities under
development. However, the Public
Regulation Commission (“PRC”) has recently ordered the state’s utilities to
significantly increase the share of renewable energy in their total sources of
supply to
Longer term impacts
are noted by EMNRD in a study on the Potential Economic
Benefits from Commercial Wind Power Facilities in the State of New Mexico conducted
by the BBC Research & Consulting Group which concluded that five
facilities, each with a generating capacity of 40 megawatts, would produce $60
million in statewide sales, $20 million dollars in wages for one year, $2.5
million in on-going sales, 60 on-going jobs statewide, $225,000 in annual royalty
revenues for the state land fund and $400,000 each year to the general fund
from gross receipts and income taxes.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The PRC notes that HB 146a defines a “qualified
energy resource” to include “a fluidized-bed technology”. But this technology is currently also used in
some coal-fired generation units, which are probably not intended to receive a
renewable energy production tax credit.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According to TRD, the Public Regulatory
Commission (PRC) has regulations requiring energy providers to distribute 2 percent
of their total energy supplies through renewable energy sources by
TRD’s analysis notes other state, local and
federal incentives for renewable power generators that include federal
renewable production tax credits, federal renewable energy production incentives,
accelerated depreciation and systems benefits charges that provide financial
support for renewable energy development.
According to EIA, bio mass is organic material
which has stored sunlight in the form of chemical energy. Biomass fuels
include wood, wood waste, straw, manure, sugar cane, and many other byproducts
from a variety of agricultural processes and account for 38 percent of the
renewable energy market; however in 2000 renewable energy accounted for only 7
percent of the total energy consumed in the
SN/njw