NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Stewart

 

DATE TYPED:

2/4/03

 

HB

79

 

SHORT TITLE:

School Board Campaign Finance Reporting

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Chavez

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

NFI

NFI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Secretary of State (SOS)

New Mexico State Department of Education (SDE)

LFC Files

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 79 creates the “School Board Campaign Finance Reporting Act.” House Bill 79 proposes to establish campaign finance reporting requirements for school board elections and provides for enforcement penalties. 

 

     Significant Issues

 

The Act applies to individuals who have filed declarations of candidacy for positions on local school boards and governing boards of technical and vocational institutes, area vocational institutes, community colleges and branch community colleges.  The Act  a) establishes campaign reporting requirements; b) excludes certain candidates from reporting; c) establishes requirements for the content of reports of contributions and expenditures; d) prescribes limitations on the use of campaign contributions; and e) sets forth provisions for enforcement and penalties.

 


FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The bill contains no appropriation.  The State Department of Education (SDE) indicates that this Act does not appear to cause any direct fiscal impact for local school districts.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

The Act provides that if a candidate violates the provisions of the Act and is elected to a school board, that person shall not serve on the board or participate in school board meetings until the person satisfies the reporting requirements and pays all penalties owed.  The SDE indicates that this provision may negatively impact a local school board’s ability to conduct its business.

 

TECHNICAL ISSUES

 

The SDE indicates the Act is unclear whether the provisions of the Act  (which indicate that a person would not serve on the board or participate in school board meetings until the person satisfies the reporting requirements and all penalties owed are paid) would result in a vacancy in the membership of the local school board for purposes of the Public School Code and, if so, whether the filling of the vacancy in the manner prescribed by the Public School Code would result in the removal of the member.

 

FC/njw