NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Sharer |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Define When Life Begins |
SB |
SJR 8 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Chavez |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
$30.0 (FY 05) |
Non-Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
See
Narrative |
Non-Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Conflicts with SJR
7
Attorney General’s Office (AG)
Department
of Health (DOH)
LFC
Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Joint
Resolution 8 amends Article II, Section 18 of the Constitution of New Mexico to
provide that life beings at fertilization and continues until natural death.
Significant Issues
In a non-abortion context, the AG believes by defining when life ends as being at the time of “natural” death, its adoption might raise questions as to the continued validity of state law addressing other matters involving “unnatural” death, including justifiable homicide, the imposition of capital punishment, and other existing law that may authorize or excuse a death that is not the result of natural causes. To the extent, a decision authorized under the Uniform Healthcare Decisions Act to terminate life-sustaining treatment might be subject to challenge, depending on how one interprets the meaning of “natural” death in that context.
The Department of
Health (DOH) states Senate Joint Resolution 8 would require amendment or repeal
of some existing New Mexico law pertaining to organ donation (24-6A-1 through
24-6A-15 NMSA 1978), vital statistics (24-14-1 through 24-14-31 NMSA 1978),
abortion (30-5-1 through 30-5-3 NMSA 1978), and criminal statutes.
Additionally, DOH
indicates this resolution will have a significant impact on the availability of
contraceptives such as emergency contraception and the termination of pregnancy,
DOH, also expressed concern that since the beginning of life is viewed differently
by various cultures and religions, passing this resolution may be seen as a
conflict between church and state.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
No appropriation is
contained in this bill. However, a $30.0
non-recurring impact to the general fund will likely occur in FY 05 (the next
general election is in November 04) for advertising and printing costs incurred
by the Secretary of State for this ballot measure. The impact to the general fund will occur in
the preceding fiscal year if a special election is called prior to November
04. There will likely be an additional
non-recurring fiscal impact to the general fund for the repeal or amendment of
existing
The AG may also
experience fiscal implications in the event of a judicial challenge to this
legislation or other statute, regulation or law of this state that may be
impacted.
Because of the nature of the proposed resolution, both DOH and the AG may be faced with legal issues and questions that potentially may impact staff time in the event of a judicial challenge to this legislation or any other law of this state that may be impacted.
CONFLICT
Senate Joint Resolution 8 conflicts with Senate Joint Resolution 7, which proposes a different definition of the beginning of human life, to be at conception and the onset of cell division.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
On page 1, line 19 the word “natural” in referencing death is ambiguous.
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The following is in
the context of abortions:
In 1973, the United
States Supreme Court determined that a woman’s right to seek an abortion in the
first trimester of pregnancy was protected under the right to privacy contained
in the United States Constitution. See
Roe v. Wade, 410
Other state
legislatures have attempted to define when life begins. However, federal courts have found this to be
insufficient to overcome the protection afforded in the federal constitution.
Until the federal
constitutional protection afforded every woman in her first trimester of pregnancy
is modified in the federal constitution or reinterpreted by the U.S. Supreme
Court, language such as this proposed constitutional amendment will have no
impact on that protection.