NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
|
SPONSOR: |
Nava |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
|
SHORT TITLE: |
Out-of-School Programs Study |
SB |
SJM 5 |
||||
|
|
ANALYST: |
Chabot |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
|
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$.01 (See Narrative) |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses
Received From
Children, Youth
and Families Department (CYFD)
Department
of Health (DOH)
State
Department of Education
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Joint Memorial
5 requests CYFD, Department of Labor, DOH, and other appropriate agencies
identify direct dollars being expended for out-of-school programs. All participants in the cooperative agreement
advisory committee are to issue a summary report of total dollars by county and
municipality by program area and impact, and make recommendations on issues requiring
further study. Expenditure information
is requested for fiscal years 2001-2003.
The memorial requests that a formal report be presented to the
Legislative Education Study Committee by November 2003.
Significant
Issues
CYFD states that this information was provided in calendar year 2000 as a result of a previous Senate Joint Memorial. They will use the previous information as a baseline for the requested information.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Administrative costs
may be incurred in this study, especially if a contract is used to obtain the
requested information. No estimate of
required funds was provided by responding agencies.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
If the Legislative
Education Study Committee (LESC) requires this information, a method should be
devised so that this information could be collected by the Department of
Finance and Administration and reported to LESC on a monthly basis. Project codes may have to be assigned for
tracking in the financial system but the data would be timely. Collection, after-the-fact, for significant
periods of time is an inefficient method of collecting financial information.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
GC/njw