NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Komadina |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
|
SB |
65/aSPAC/aSFC |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Gilbert |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
See
Narrative |
|
Recurring |
County |
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates
HB58
LFC files
Responses
Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department
of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
SFC Amendment
The Senate Finance Committee amendment to Senate
Bill 65 makes a technical correction to page 3, line 20.
Additionally, the following language was added
to page 3, line21, to clarify what sector of the voting public is eligible to
vote in elections relating to imposition of an emergency communications and
emergency medical services tax:
In the case of an ordinance imposing an increment of
the countywide emergency communications and emergency medical services tax, the
election shall be conducted countywide.
In the case of an ordinance imposing the county area emergency communications
and emergency medical services tax, the election shall be conducted only in the
county area.
Synopsis
SPAC Amendment
The Senate Public Affairs Committee amendment to
Senate Bill 65, make a technical correction to page 3, line 20. This bill would
give counties the option to impose a countywide or a county area emergency
communications and medical services tax, including county areas outside of
specific municipal boundaries. The language in this amendment clarifies that
the outcome of elections for this purpose are determined by a majority of the
voters, as opposed to a majority of county voters who vote in such elections.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
Senate Bill 65 would
amend the County Local Option Gross Taxes Act.
Present law authorizes certain counties to impose an excise tax at a
rate not to exceed one-fourth of one percent for county emergency
communications and emergency medical services, in increments of one-sixteenth
of one percent. The proposed bill would
give counties the option to impose the county emergency communications and
medical services tax in areas of a county outside of specific municipal
boundaries. The language maintains the ordinance imposing the tax increase must
be approved by a majority of the voters in a general or special election in
order for the ordinance to go into effect.
The tax shall not be imposed for a period of more that ten years from
the effective date of the ordinance imposing the tax. The tax may only be used
for one or both of the following purposes: operation of the emergency
communications center that is designated by the Department of Finance and
Administration as a public safety answering point and operation of emergency
medical services (
Significant
Issues
· Emergency communications centers and county operated emergency medical services are essential safety-net services that are maintained to deal with routine and emergency responses.
· The proposed change in this tax would give counties further flexibility to insure emergency services throughout the county.
·
According to present law, the counties of
Chaves,
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Taxation and
Revenue Department provided the attached table on revenue impact for counties.
· Minimal potential revenue based upon FY02 taxable gross receipts for eligible counties at the 0.0625% increment total $3,309,005.
· Maximum potential revenue based upon FY02 taxable gross receipts for eligible counties at the 0.25% increment total $13,236,002.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1. What is the current condition of county operated emergency communications and emergency medical services?
2. How
will the language change affect current services of eligible counties?
3. Will
this tax limit or impede the state in any way from raising revenue from the
gross receipts tax?
MM/njw:sb:yr
Attachment
Potential Revenue from County-Area Emergency
Communications and Emergency Services Tax |
|||||
(Illustration at Fiscal Year 2002 Levels) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2002 |
Tax Increment |
|||
|
Taxable Gross Receipts |
0.0625% |
0.1250% |
0.1875% |
0.2500% |
Bernalillo |
2,006,439,195 |
1,254,024 |
2,508,049 |
3,762,073 |
5,016,098 |
Catron |
15,541,620 |
9,714 |
19,427 |
29,141 |
38,854 |
Chaves |
Not Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
|
Not Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Colfax |
62,177,085 |
38,861 |
77,721 |
116,582 |
155,443 |
Curry |
83,042,878 |
51,902 |
103,804 |
155,705 |
207,607 |
DeBaca |
8,331,668 |
5,207 |
10,415 |
15,622 |
20,829 |
Dona Ana |
406,085,467 |
253,803 |
507,607 |
761,410 |
1,015,214 |
Eddy |
Not Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Grant |
114,158,201 |
71,349 |
142,698 |
214,047 |
285,396 |
Guadalupe |
15,963,412 |
9,977 |
19,954 |
29,931 |
39,909 |
Harding |
3,592,928 |
2,246 |
4,491 |
6,737 |
8,982 |
|
15,848,568 |
9,905 |
19,811 |
29,716 |
39,621 |
Lea |
Not Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
|
Not Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Luna |
43,554,342 |
27,221 |
54,443 |
81,664 |
108,886 |
McKinley |
285,180,667 |
178,238 |
356,476 |
534,714 |
712,952 |
Mora |
22,058,800 |
13,787 |
27,574 |
41,360 |
55,147 |
Otero |
Not Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Quay |
18,880,834 |
11,801 |
23,601 |
35,402 |
47,202 |
|
191,633,398 |
119,771 |
239,542 |
359,313 |
479,083 |
|
39,046,229 |
24,404 |
48,808 |
73,212 |
97,616 |
Sandoval |
Not Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
Not
Eligible |
|
991,844,954 |
619,903 |
1,239,806 |
1,859,709 |
2,479,612
|
San Miguel |
53,135,668 |
33,210 |
66,420 |
99,629 |
132,839 |
|
561,298,384 |
350,811 |
701,623 |
1,052,434 |
1,403,246 |
Sierra |
20,284,459 |
12,678 |
25,356 |
38,033 |
50,711 |
Socorro |
32,711,927 |
20,445 |
40,890 |
61,335 |
81,780 |
|
129,345,235 |
80,841 |
161,682 |
242,522 |
323,363 |
|
46,020,686 |
28,763 |
57,526 |
86,289 |
115,052 |
|
26,036,844 |
16,273 |
32,546 |
48,819 |
65,092 |
|
102,195,305 |
63,872 |
127,744 |
191,616 |
255,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Eligible
Counties |
5,294,408,754 |
3,309,005 |
6,618,011 |
9,927,016 |
13,236,022 |