NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Papen |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Pink Bollworm Control |
SB |
56 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$400.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
GF |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates
HB 99
Relates
to HB 94
Relates to Appropriation for
Responses
Received From
New
Mexico Department of Agriculture at NMSU
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 56 appropriates $400.0 from the
general fund to the Board of Regents of New Mexico State University for the
NMDA to match expenditures by pink bollworms districts for the control and
eradication of pink bollworms pursuant to the provisions of the state’s Pink
Bollworm Act.
Significant Issues
In its analysis of SB 56, the
NMDA reports that “Pink bollworms
are trapped annually in all cotton production areas of
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $400.0 contained in this
bill is a recurring cost to the general fund.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal
year 2004 shall revert to the general fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPLICATIONS
The NMDA would administer the program and pass
the funding through to the established pink bollworm control districts.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP,
RELATIONSHIP
RELATES TO HB 94. HB 94 appropriates funds for the control and
eradication of boll weevils.
OTHER
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
This
request for funding was submitted to and approved by the board of regents of
NMSU. However, the Commission on Higher
Education did not recommend it for funding.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS