NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Garcia, M.J. |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
NMSU Compliance with NCAA |
SB |
48 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
L. Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$250.0 |
|
|
Recurring |
GF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates HB 128
Relates
to Appropriation for
LFC files
Responses
Received From
Commission
on Higher Education (CHE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 48
appropriates $250.0 from the general fund to the Board of Regents of New Mexico
State University to meet NCAA (national collegiate athletic association) and
federal requirements by providing for scholarships and coaching and athletic
trainer positions.
Significant Issues
This request was submitted as an expansion
request by NMSU and is intended to cover employee, supplies and program
expenses. The CHE reports that the
$250.0 would be an increase of 9.0% over the current appropriation for the
program and includes the reinstatement of a funding reduction in the 2002
General Appropriation Act.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of
$250.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance
remaining at the end of fiscal year 2004 shall revert to the general fund.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP,
RELATIONSHIP
DUPLICATES HB 128
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
This request was
submitted to and approved by the NMSU Board of Regents and was ranked as one of
eight #1 priorities out of 13 research and public service new or expansion
requests submitted to CHE. However, the
CHE did not recommend funding for this program.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
What
are the consequences of not this funding request?
2.
Specifically,
what non-compliance deficiencies is this funding request intended to overcome?
3.
Is
NMSU the only institution facing this
type of problem?
4. Is this request more than a desire to reinstate a funding
reduction contained in the 2002 General Appropriation Act?