NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
HJC |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
119/HJCS |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Sexual Assault Survivors Emergency Care |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Narrative |
|
|
Relates to House Bill 315
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Responses
Received From
Department
of Health (DOH)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
The House Judiciary
Committee Substitute for House Bill 119 requires
HB 119/HJCS defines
“emergency contraception’ as a drug approved by the federal food and drug
administration that prevents pregnancy after sexual intercourse.
HB 119/HJCS also
requires the following:
All hospital personnel
providing care to sexual assault victims will be trained to provide factual
information about emergency contraception.
Upon complaint, hospitals would be investigated
for compliance by the DOH.
Hospitals found noncompliant will be subject to
fines of $5,000 per noncompliant sexual assault survivor incident and $5,000
per month if staff training is not found adequate.
Significant
Issues
Among women who become pregnant from sexual
assault (32,000 per year nationally), 50% end their pregnancies in
abortion. Provision of emergency
contraception may decrease the number of pregnancies, and thus abortions, that
result from sexual assault. Emergency contraception
refers to emergency contraceptive pills.
These pills are NOT abortion pills; they act primarily by interfering
with ovulation and have been proven to be eighty-nine percent (89%) effective
in reducing the risk of pregnancy following unprotected intercourse. Time is of the essence in providing emergency
contraceptive pills; delaying the first dose by twelve (12) hours increases the
odds of pregnancy by almost fifty percent (50%). Survivors of sexual assault
may be unaware of emergency contraception: nationally, one out of four women of
childbearing age are unaware of emergency contraceptive pills. In other states,
hospitals have been sued for failure to offer emergency contraceptive pills.
Most
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
DOH notes that the cost of enforcing HB 119/HJCS
including, investigation, prosecution, and defense of appeals, will be
substantial and require additional staff or contract resources.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The responsibility for investigating complaints
and enforcing regulations lies under the jurisdiction of the Division of Health
Improvement of DOH. The mechanisms for enforcing HB119/HJCS including
investigation, prosecution, and defense of appeals, do not exist and would have
to be created.
HB 119/HJCS relates to HB 315, Emergency
Contraception Act.
In 2001, there were 2,646 sex crimes reported to
the New Mexico Interpersonal Violence Data Central Repository. Of these sex crimes, 41% were cases of
criminal sexual penetration. The
emergency contraceptive pill should be offered to these sexual assault
survivors who seek medical services.
According to sexual assault advocates and services providers in
DOH notes that certain federal and state funding
streams may not permit offering contraception advice or contraception, further
complicating compliance or enforcement with this Act. Problems may also be anticipated with the
lack of an age limitation on women who may be offered this advice and
contraceptive medication. Also, the lack
of definition as to what constitutes sexual assault makes potential enforcement
activity difficult.
Education for emergency health care providers
and other appropriate hospital personnel could accomplish the desired goal
proposed in HB 119. The fine imposed on
hospitals for not providing information or services required in the act could
be detrimental. A legislative mandate
that includes a fine for hospitals that do not offer information or distribute
emergency contraception to sexual assault survivors is not necessary. However, hospital personnel should be
educated about the benefits of emergency contraception and required to offer
this information and treatment to sexual assault survivors.
Hospitals with religious objections to providing
emergency contraceptive pills should be required to educate survivors of sexual
assault about emergency contraceptive pills and refer them to a source where
the pills may be obtained within 72 hours.
DW/njw