NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Thompson |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
17 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Voter ID by Signature Verification |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Collard |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
$250.0 |
|
|
Non-Recurring |
General
Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC
Files
Responses
Received From
Secretary
of State
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Bill 17
appropriates $250.0 from the general fund to the Secretary of State for the purpose
of purchasing digital facsimile printers.
If the actual signature is significantly different from the facsimile
signature, a member of the precinct board or, during early voting, an officer
of the county clerk’s office will use alternative identification, such as:
·
· Social
Security card
· Valid
· Any
other identification card issued by an agency of the state, one of its political
subdivisions, or the
· Any
valid employee identification card containing a photograph of the voter and
issued by an employer in the ordinary course of the employer’s business.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $250.0
contained in this bill is a non-recurring expense to the general fund. Any
unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY04 shall revert to
the general fund.
ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPLICATIONS
The Secretary of State
indicates there is an impact on the agency information systems and Bureau of
Elections to monitor all installation and compliance. There is also a substantial impact on
counties for scanning of existing certificates of registration; for example,
there are approximately 300,000 in
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The Secretary of State
indicates that a bill should require signature identification voters to vote on
a provisional ballot after signing affidavit.
If signature identification voters are allowed to vote on a machine
based on signature alone, and it turns out that the voter is not who they said
they were, there is no way to determine which vote was that person’s to remove
it from the voting machine. If signature
identification voters are required to vote on a provisional ballot, the ballot
could then be removed by hand. The
Secretary of State recommends an amendment to the bill on page three, lines
four through eight to read, “Require voter to vote on provisional ballot,
rather than machine.”
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
What
are the alternatives to signature identification voting ?