NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Romero |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Development of Renewable Energy Sources |
SB |
SJM 79 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Maloy |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
Environment
Department
Energy,
Minerals and Natural Resources
Public
Regulation Commission
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Joint Memorial 79 expresses strong legislative encouragement and support for the development of renewable energy resources, including the desirability of requiring Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS).
The joint
memorial directs the Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)
to report to the First Session of the 47th Legislature (2005) on the
resulting growth of renewable energy development in
SJM79 also
urges the Public Regulation Commission (PRC) to enact its recently adopted renewable
energy rule containing an RPS to become effective no later than
Significant Issues
1. This
joint memorial clarifies the position of the New Mexico Legislature regarding renewable
energy development and, specifically, the RPS.
The RPS requires that investor-owned utilities generate or procure 10%
of their energy from renewable sources by 2011.
While the rule is scheduled to take effect on
2. It is important to note that the PRC’s Renewable Energy rulemaking, wherein a RPS was adopted, spanned a time period of almost two years. It involved a diverse array of individuals and businesses, including electric utility companies, rural electric cooperatives, renewable energy developers and advocates, representatives of federal, state, local and tribal government, and public/consumer interest groups. Collectively, these entities expended significant time and financial resources developing comments and recommendations, as well as participating in public hearings, workshops and other forums held throughout the PRC rulemaking process, to create an effective, workable rule.
3. Built into the rule is an exemption and variance process and a provision requiring the PRC to biennially review the rule to examine, among other matters, “the economic impact on the utilities’ customers by class or otherwise”.
4. SJM 79 essentially endorses this inclusive, deliberative rulemaking process and the resulting RPS. The PRC is a statewide elected body, rather than an appointed body as with most other utility commissions.
5. The
RPS represents an important provision to create a demand for renewable energy
in
FISCAL
IMPLICATIONS
There
is no appropriation in SJM 079. However,
there will be secondary implications by way of FTE and budget resources needs
for the development processes.
CONFLICT
AND RELATIONSHIP
·
SJM79 endorses the RPS going into effect by
· SB 836 amends the Public Utility Act to specifically provide the PRC the authority to adopt renewable portfolio standards as well as other renewable energy provisions.
SJM/njw:yr