NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
|
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
HJM88 |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Study Certain Sales on Indian Reservations |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Hayes |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB 602
Responses
Received From
Taxation
and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department
of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
House Joint Memorial
88 directs the secretary of the Taxation and Revenue Department to study and
report to the appropriate legislative interim committee on the impact to the
state, local governments and the business community regarding the sale of
tangible personal property to non-tribal members on land of a tribe with which
the secretary has not entered into a cooperative agreement to collect gross
receipts tax.
Significant
Issues
1. Currently, Section
9-11-12.1 authorizes the secretary of the Taxation and Revenue Department to
enter into cooperative agreements with the Pueblos of Isleta, Laguna, Nambe,
Sandia, Santa Ana and Santa Clara for the exchange of information and the
reciprocal, joint or common enforcement, administration, collection, remittance
and audit of gross receipts tax revenues of those jurisdictions. Section 9-11-12.2 authorizes a similar
agreement with the Navajo Nation.
2. Sections
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The LFC did not
receive specific information regarding the amount of gross receipts tax revenue
remitted to the State of
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to TRD, administrative implementation of the
agreements appears to be working well.
The department and the pueblos have been able to meet the criteria
needed for implementation. TRD is not
aware of any significant problems associated with implementation of the cooperative
agreements.
RELATIONSHIP
SB 602 focuses on
intergovernmental gross receipts agreements.
CMH/njw