NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Robinson |
DATE TYPED: |
03/05/03 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Peace Officers With Unclaimed Property |
SB |
768 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Fox-Young |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
Attorney
General (AG)
Corrections
Department (CD)
Department
of Public Safety (DPS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 768 amends
The bill also makes
technical changes to the statute.
Significant
Issues
The Attorney General (AG) notes that the bill does not require law enforcement officers to conduct background checks prior to the sale of firearms.
The Department of Public Safety (DPS) makes the following statement: “In our view, the selling of firearms to the public, which were originally obtained pursuant to law enforcement operational activities, is contrary to sound public policy.”
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
DPS notes that the vast majority of seized,
forfeited, and unclaimed firearms have relatively low values and are generally
not sold by law enforcement.
JCF/yr