NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Senate Judiciary Committee |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Create Crime Stoppers Commission |
SB |
683/SJCS |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
L. Baca |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimal |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Identical to HB 921, Crime Stoppers Act
LFC files
Responses
Received From
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Judiciary
Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 683 creates the five-member Crime Stoppers
Advisory Council, prescribes its duties and responsibilities and 2-year term of
appointment by the Governor; provides for confidentiality of informants, and
imposes penalties for violation of the provisions of the act.
Significant
Issues
Crime Stopper programs are well known throughout
The powers and duties of the Crime Stoppers
Commission are to:
The bill prohibits the Council from taking part
in the receipt of reports or tips regarding criminal activity. Further, the bill stipulates that information
received from an informant is not admissible in a court or other tribunal
unless:
·
a criminal defendant claims the report
contains exculpatory information; and
·
a person exonerated of a criminal charge
that was filed as a result of a report to a local crime stoppers program and
denial of access to the program would leave the person without the ability to
offer prima facie proof that a legal injury was suffered through the wrongful
act of another.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill does not contain appropriation but
provides for payment of the Council’s mileage and per diem.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Logistics for
conducting the affairs of the Council are not addressed in the bill. Some of
the Council’s perceived needs include staff support, supplies, meeting places,
dissemination of information and other items that councils, boards and task
forces require to carry out their responsibilities.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The bill prohibits any
member, officer or employee of a local crime stoppers program to reveal to an
individual other than the proper law enforcement agencies any information
gained through the program or the contents of records and reports that are
confidential. The bill makes violations
of this section a misdemeanor. Persons
providing information in good faith is immune from civil liability for any acts
of omissions resulting in the arrest and conviction of a person who is later
acquitted or exonerated of the charge.
The bill also provides
that a local crime stoppers program must be certified before it can claim
confidentiality pursuant to the provisions of the bill.