.NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Feldman |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Public Health Emergency Response Act |
SB |
194/aSPAC/aSJC |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 232, HB
253 and HB 254
Responses
Received From
Department
of Health (DOH)
Health
Policy Commission (HPC)
New
Mexico Department of Corrections (NMCD)
Department
of Public Safety (DPS)
Attorney
General (AG)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of
SJC Amendment
The “Compensation” section of the bill is amended by changing the amount of compensation calculated when property is taken during a public emergency to include “lost revenues due to the taking or appropriation of property including a health facility. Additionally, the following changes were made to the bill:
· Removed Section 15B pertaining to compensation of a health facility when it is decontaminated.
· Inserted language regarding provisions for the appeal of a determination made by the attorney general.
· Inserted a new Section (16) to protect the job of a person who has been quarantined under the provisions of the Health Emergency Response Act.
· Clarified language by referencing the “ the Eminent Domain Code” when taking or appropriating property.
· Clarified language by substituting “taking or appropriation” of property for “destruction” or “destroyed” property.
The Senate Public Affairs Committee amends Section 14 (Immunity) of the bill by taking account of the Tort Claim Act in matters of liability. This change in language was not considered in the duplicate HB 231 amendments.
The Committee further amends the “Compensation” section of the bill by:
Synopsis
of Original Bill
Senate Bill 194 relates to public health emergencies and would enact the Public Health Emergency Response Act. The bill provides for procedures for declaring and responding to a public health emergency, provides protection of individual civil rights, provides civil penalties for violation of the Act, and would further clarify the Governor’s authority to declare and terminate a public health emergency.
SB
194 also directs the Department of Health (DOH) to coordinate and consult with
the Department of Public Safety and the Director of Homeland Security in order
to protect the health safety and welfare of the people.
During an emergency, the DOH Secretary is given special
powers to coordinate public health care facilities and supplies. Public health care facilities include
non-federal facilities or buildings, whether public or private, for-profit or
nonprofit, that are used, operated, or designed to provide health services,
medical treatment or preventive care.
Facilities utilized will be justly compensated as determined by the
state Attorney General.
The
bill also adopts procedures for the DOH Secretary for isolating and
quarantining persons who have threatening communicable diseases. The procedures include steps for obtaining
an ex- parte order from the court authorizing
isolation or quarantine. Such orders
would need to clearly justify the need for isolation/quarantine. The Secretary
would be able to isolate/quarantine a person for 24 hours without a court
order, but would need a court order for any further isolation/quarantine. Under the bill, a person that was being held
under isolation/quarantine could petition the court to let him/her out of
isolation/quarantine. A hearing must be
held within 3 business days.
The bill also addresses vaccination and treatment of a
public health threatening communicable diseases. A person can be isolated/quarantined
by the DOH Secretary, if that person is unable or unwilling to undergo
vaccination and that person is a threat for spreading a public health threatening
communicable disease.
Also,
the bill allows for the DOH Secretary and the Secretary of the Department of
Public Safety to enter into memorandums of understanding with Indian tribes to
effectuate the act.
Finally,
the bill provides for immunity from liability for health officials when
complying with or attempting to comply with this act. The bill provides for a $5,000 civil penalty
for anyone who violates this act and that the act will not limit any other
remedies under common law or statutes.
The
bill contains an emergency provision.
Significant
Issues
The Department of Health (DOH) already has
authority to respond to public health conditions in the Public Health Act,
Sections
During the 2002 Legislative Session,
Senate Joint Memorial 62 and House Joint Memorial 34 directed DOH, the NM
Department of Public Safety (NMDOH), and the Attorney General (AG) to study
existing emergency response laws. The Memorials further recommended that DOH review
the federally commissioned CDC Model State Health Emergency Powers Act and make
recommendations for necessary legislation to address a public health emergency
response. The agencies designated a
Tri-Agency Attorney Work Group to collaborate on the Study. The Work Group conducted a series of eight
public meetings throughout the State from April to December 2002 to solicit
public comment. Based on the responses received from these
town hall meetings, as well as numerous meetings with interested groups such as
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the
A significant issue raised by the NM Corrections Department
(NMCD) pertains to the prisons being considered health facilities as defined
within the bill. Because the prison
facilities do offer health services to the inmates, the facilities could be
subject to control by the DOH Secretary in the event of a health
emergency. This would mean that the
Secretary could take over the infirmaries to assist in a public health
emergency. The Secretary would also have
the power to take over medical supplies for rationing. However, the Corrections Department indicates
that since such an emergency is unlikely and the use of NMCS facilities is
slight, the possible impact of this bill to NMCD is minimal.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
SB
194 relates to the DOH Strategic Plan, Program Area II, which assures statewide
availability of essential public health functions and provides for conducting
disease and risk factor surveillance, surveys and special studies to monitor
and identify conditions of public health importance, and to control disease
outbreaks and urgent health conditions.
Passage
of the proposed legislation will have positive performance implications on the
New Mexico Department of Public Safety and state government, in general, in
that, as noted above, it will provide state government with a blue print to
follow in order to adequately respond to a public health emergency.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Departments acknowledge negligible fiscal
implications upon passage of this legislation. The proposed statutory structure
would create immunity for government response in the face of a public health
emergency.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
It should be noted that due process concerns are
addressed throughout the legislation.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Duplicates House Bill
231, Public Health Emergency Response Act.
Relates to:
·
HB 232, Emergency
Powers Code, which would require the recompiling of NMSA 1978 Sections relating
to Disaster Relief and Emergency Management.
·
HB
253, which would amend the NM Riot Control Act to provide
the Governor with the express authority to order an evacuation during a state
of emergency.
·
HB
254, which would amend the NM Inspection of Public Records Act to protect from
public disclosure tactical response plans or procedures prepared by or for the
state or a local subdivision of the state.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
HPC recommends the following definition changes in SB 194:
· “ health care supplies” Page 2, line 20 should include food and water as a requirement to operate any medical facility. Also, service contractors for much of the high technology equipment needs to be included. In addition,” Durable medical equipment” has a federally established definition that is generally accepted in the health care industry. The definition is: “Medical equipment that is ordered by a doctor for use in the home. These items must be reusable, such as walkers, wheelchairs, or hospital beds (http://www.medicare.gov/Glossary).” SB 194 may intend for the definition to be broader and include equipment that may not be reusable, and is not used in home settings, and/or is not ordered by a doctor.
·
“health facility” Page 2, line 25 is defined as
a “facility licensed by the state of
HPC notes that SB 194 is silent about emergency medical services and emergency medical services transportation in any capacity. A very important component of response to a public health emergency will be emergency medical services.
SB 194 empowers the DOH Secretary to assume
responsibility for the operation of healthcare facilities and to regulate,
ration and distribute healthcare supplies. HPC states that SB 194 is also
silent about how the distribution of supplies would occur. The Public
Regulatory Commission regulates motor carriers in
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
SB
194 provides direction on how the State of
The
draft document was also presented to the Legislative Health and Human Services
Committee, the Interim Corrections Oversight Justice Committee and the Interim
Information Technology Oversight Committees. Each Interim Committee endorsed
the bill. In addition to the Interim Committees, Governor
Richardson and the three agencies (NMDOH, NMDPS, and AG) have endorsed this
bill.
Legal research was conducted under contract with the UNM Institute of Public Law concerning existing emergency powers statutes in other states and on other emergency preparedness legal issues.
Much of the supplies that