NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Kidd |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Soft Drink Tax Act |
SB |
139 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
20
% of tax revenue |
|
|
Recurring |
Dept.
of Health |
|
80%
of tax revenue |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
$0.1 |
$0.1 |
Recurring |
Soft
Drink Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC files
Responses
Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
No Response from: Taxation and
Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 139 (SB139) would enact legislation to tax soft drinks, and to appropriate the net receipts attributable to the tax to diabetes prevention, public education, research and treatment of patients with diabetes.
The tax imposed is $2.00
per gallon of soft drink or soft drink syrup sold or offered for sale in
Soft drinks sold to or
by any instrumentality of the armed forces of the
The net receipts from the tax
imposed by the Soft Drink Tax Act are to be distributed as follows:
A)
20% to the Department of Health for diabetes prevention and public
education
programs.
B)
80% to the University of New Mexico School of
Medicine for research on diabetes
and treatment of patients with
diabetes.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
No fiscal impact is
noted to the general fund. However,
marginal impact may be seen in gross receipts when tax increases are passed to
consumers.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According to DOH:
Approximately 1 in 11 adults in
Behavioral Risk Surveillance System,
(BRFSS) 2000 data.
·
120,563
New Mexicans have diabetes. Of these:
ü
85,181
know they have diabetes.
ü
35,382
do not know they have diabetes.
·
American
Indians are about 3 times more likely to have diagnosed diabetes than
non-Hispanic Whites.
·
Hispanics,
as well as African-Americans, are about 2 times more likely to have diagnosed
diabetes than non-Hispanic Whites.
·
In
Hospital Inpatient Discharge Data collected by
the HPC shows that in 2000, diabetes was one of the top 10 reasons for
hospitalization among the following groups:
·
For
males 19 – 44 years, the 5th most common reason
·
For
males ages 45 – 64, the 6th most common reason
·
For
females ages 45-64, the 7th most common reason
According
to the Centers for Disease Control:
·
Among
persons aged 18 years and older in the
·
In
comparison, among persons aged 18 years and older in N.M., 6.5%
had diagnosed diabetes, higher than the national average.
diabetes. (Centers for Disease Control)
·
Over
half of adults with diabetes in
·
New
Mexicans with diabetes are about 3 times more likely than those without the
disease to have been told by a doctor that they have high blood pressure
(BRFSS, 2000).
·
In
1999, there were 17,775 diabetes-related hospitalizations in
According to the Diabetes Prevention and Control
Program (DPCP) at DOH, additional funding from the Soft Drink Tax Act would
enable DOH to continue further educational and prevention programs as diabetes
rates increase among populations in
SN/njw