NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
Sharer |
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Educational Standards Waivers |
SB |
80/aSEC |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
|
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY03 |
FY04 |
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Responses
Received From
State
Department of Education (SDE)
Commission
on Higher Education (CHE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SEC Amendment
The Senate
Education Committee amendments are technical in nature and do not change the
original intent of the bill. The amendment does include a new subsection that
reads:
The
state board shall only waive requirements that do not conflict with the federal
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 or rules adopted pursuant to that act.
Synopsis
of Original Bill
Senate Bill 80 adds a
section to the Public School Code requiring the State Board of Education (SBE)
to waive for all public schools that exceed educational standards certain
statutory requirements, including the following:
(1) accreditation review,
(2) length of school day,
(3) individual class load requirements,
(4) subject area requirements,
(5) graduation requirements,
(6) evaluation standards for school personnel and
(7) purchase of instructional materials from the SBE-approved list.
Additional waivers could be requested to support innovations.
Significant
Issues
Existing statutes provide for a basic set of
consistent requirements for all schools.
The SBE cannot currently waive statutory requirements, and the state’s
accountability system is developed to reflect those statutory requirements.
SDE reports this bill is potentially in conflict
with the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) with a single state
accountability system that is applied equally and fairly. The state accreditation process ensures that
a school adheres to statutory requirements that will be aligned with NCLB.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
For the state’s
accountability system to be effective, all schools must submit similar data to
the SDE in order to ensure appropriate comparisons are made between the SBE’s
performance standards, achievement of the schools district’s students and
compliance with the provisions of NCLB.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Since the waiver process is outlined for schools
that exceed educational standards, may it be assumed that these schools would
continue to meet all requirements of the State Accountability system and other
federal laws such as the NCLB?
POSSIBLE
QUESTIONS
1.
Could a waiver of state statutory
requirements be construed as giving up legislative
authority?
2.
How many school districts have expressed
an interest in this type of waivers?
RS/njw