NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Taylor

 

DATE TYPED:

02/27/03

 

HB

425/aHJC

 

SHORT TITLE:

DNA Sample Processing

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Fox-Young

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

$1,000.0

 

 

$0.1 Significant

Recurring

General Fund

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Responses Received From

Department of Public Safety (DPS)

Attorney General (AG)

New Mexico Commission on Higher Education (NMCHE)

 

No Response

Corrections Department (CD)

New Mexico State University (NMSU)

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of HJC Amendment

 

The HJC amendment strikes the physical science institute at New Mexico State University, providing that the Department of Public Safety (DPS) may contract with an accredited genetic testing laboratory.

 

DPS recommends the bill be further amended to specify that any contract laboratories must be accredited to perform forensic analysis.

 

     Synopsis of Original Bill

 

House Bill 425 appropriates $1,000.0 from the general fund to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) for expenditure in fiscal years 2003 to 2005 to contract with the genetic testing laboratory of the physical science institute at New Mexico State University for DNA sample processing.

 

Unprocessed DNA samples of the Corrections Department (CD), the state crime laboratory and other state and local law enforcement agencies may be processed pursuant to this appropriation.

 

The bill contains an emergency appropriation.

 

     Significant Issues

 

The Attorney General (AG) and the Department of Public Safety (DPS) report that the NMSU genetic testing laboratory is not accredited to perform forensic testing of DNA samples.  Accreditation is required by the federal DNA Advisory Board.  AG indicates that any results obtained during the testing would be subject to challenge during any criminal proceeding and would likely be inadmissible. 

 

DPS notes that

 

  • Because NMSU is not accredited by the National Forensic Sciences Training Center or by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board, any DNA profiles generated at the university would not be accepted for inclusion in the federal of state DNA database. 

 

  • The department cannot subcontract with laboratories that are not accredited, as doing so would put the department in violation of DNA Advisory Board Standards.  Such a move would jeopardize the department’s certification, and make the department ineligible for accreditation, federal funds and inclusion in the federal DNA database program.

 

  • Any forensic contract laboratories must use the same DNA analysis platform as is used in New Mexico crime laboratories.  NMSU is not restricted to this platform.

 

  • It is unclear how serological screening of these cases, a significant element of biological evidence analysis, will be performed.  Screening is done prior to DNA testing and requires forensic expertise. 

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The appropriation of $1,000.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense.  Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2005 shall revert to the general fund.

 

A backlog of unprocessed DNA samples is in all of the agencies mentioned in the bill.  Any appropriation directed at processing any portion of these samples is a recurring expense, as the state’s current resources are insufficient to keep pace with the growing pool of samples.

 

OTHER SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

 

The act of earmarking funds for a specific laboratory may have the unintended effect of decreasing efficiency because it limits competition.

 

JCF/njw:sb