NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is
intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the
legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume
responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for
other purposes.
The most recent FIR
version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be
obtained from the LFC in
SPONSOR: |
|
DATE TYPED: |
|
HB |
93/aHGUAC |
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Local Government Investment Criteria |
SB |
|
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Gilbert |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years Impact |
Recurring or
Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY03 |
FY04 |
|
|
|
|
$0.1
See Narrative |
Recurring |
|
|
|
$0.1
See Narrative |
Recurring |
Municipal
Funds |
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates SB 40
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of HGUAC Amendment
The House Government and Urban Affairs Committee
amendment to House Bill 93 makes the following changes:
Removed from HB 93, on
page 3, line 1 through 3, is language allowing local governments to invest
county or municipal permanent funds, equaling $15 million or more, in the same
manner as funds of the state treasurer are invested.
HB 93/aHGUAC also
changes the investment authority for local government permanent funds as follows:
(1) if the fund is
less than five ten million dollars ($5,000,000), ($10,000,000)
it shall be invested as other funds of the local government; and
(2) if the fund is five ten($5,000,000) ($10,000,000) or over to fifteen
million dollars ($15,000,000), it may be invested as funds of class A
counties are invested. and
Synopsis
of Original Bill
House
Bill 93 amends NMSA 1978, §
Significant
Issues
This bill adds investment authority language to
NMSA 1978, §
According to the Department of Finance and
Administration (DFA), the intent of this bill is to better safeguard local
government permanent funds.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Limitation of investment options may impact
overall investment returns for local government permanent funds.
RLG/sb/njw