[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
McSorley
|
DATE TYPED: |
01/30/02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Increase Public School Fund School Fund Distribution |
SJR |
11 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$96,509.0 |
See
Narrative |
Recurring |
General Fund |
|
$16,906.0 |
See
Narrative |
Recurring |
Other Beneficiaries of the Land Grant
Permanent Fund |
|
($113,205.0) |
See
Narrative |
Recurring |
Land Grant Permanent Fund |
(Parenthesis ( )
Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates HJR 15
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The
resolution proposes to increase the distribution from the Land Grant Permanent
Fund (LGPF) by 1.3 percent to 6.0 percent. Currently, the distribution is set
at 4.7 percent.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The estimate
assumes that it would take Congress the balance of FY03 to enact enabling
legislation.
SIC has stated that the distribution from the LGPF could be increased by 0.1 percent without eroding the corpus of the fund. As the accompanying graph demonstrates, this proposal would generate
increasingly smaller distributions over time. By the year 2028, the corpus of the LGPF would be sufficiently eroded as to generate less under a 6% distribution plan than it would under current law.
SN/njw:ar
Attachment
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.