[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the stand­ing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibili­ty for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Hurt

 

DATE TYPED:

01/23/02

 

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE:

Limit Legislative Bill Introductions

 

SB

SJR 2

 

 

ANALYST:

Burch

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

 

30.0

Nonrecurring

General Fund

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC files

Attorney General

Secretary of State

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

Senate Joint Resolution 2 proposes to amend Article 4, Section 19 of the New Mexico Constitution to restrict the number of bills introduced by each legislator to 10 bills, unless each additional bill is accompanied by another bill introduced by that legislator proposing to repeal an existing law.

 

     Significant Issues

 

This proposal would limit the total number of bills to 700 bills in the House and 420 bills in the Senate, totaling 1,120 bills.  This total is about 600 to 740 bills less than the total introductions in each of the last two 60-day sessions and about 80 to 150 bills more than the actual total introductions in each of the last two 30-day sessions (see “Substantive Issues” section below).

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

If passed, this question would appear on the ballot in the November 2002 general election.  The Secretary of State reports it costs $30.0 to place an item on the ballot for advertising and printing. Included in the cost is: (1) the publishing of constitutional amendments in English and Spanish for four consecutive weeks in one newspaper in each county of the state; (2) the oral translation and

 

radio broadcast into the Native American languages of Tewa, Tiwa, Towa, Keres, Zuni, Mescalero Apache, Jicarilla Apache and Navajo; and (3) the printing of amendments booklets in English and Spanish (including Spanish language translation cost) and distribution to all county clerks (100,000 booklets were printed for 2000 general election).  Therefore, there would be a nonrecurring cost to the general fund of $30.0 in FY03.  This legislation does not include an appropriation needed to fund these costs.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

Also, the Secretary of State reports the proliferation of constitutional amendments is having a serious impact on some of New Mexico’s counties’ voting systems because of ballot crowding.

 

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

 

Currently, there is no limit on the number of bills introduced.  Following is a table of the number of bills introduced during the last 7 years for the regular sessions:

 

 

TABLE 1. NUMBER OF BILLS INTRODUCED

 

 

Bill Type

1995

60 Days

1996

30 Days

1997

60 Days

1998

30 Days

1999

60 Days

2000

30 Days

2001

60 Days

House bills

1,188

793

1,392

544

929

540

997

House concurrent resolutions

1

2

0

0

1

1

2

House joint resolutions

14

19

19

22

25

20

30

House joint memorials

65

79

100

88

91

82

87

House memorials

38

7

28

30

55

25

32

House capital outlay requests

0

0

0

499

858

757

2,043

Senate bills

1,207

863

1,300

424

800

501

863

Senate concurrent resolutions

3

1

0

1

1

1

2

Senate joint resolutions

23

24

16

16

27

23

38

Senate joint memorials

101

103

75

54

67

76

87

Senate memorials

30

10

14

33

46

39

42

Senate capital outlay requests

0

0

0

518

1,018

819

2,325

Total

2,670

1,901

2,944

2,229

3,918

2,884

6,548

NOTE: In years 1997 and earlier, capital outlay proposals were made by bill.  Beginning in 1998 and forward, capital outlay proposals were made as “capital outlay requests” rather than bills.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 2. NUMBER OF BILLS COMPARED TO OTHER LEGISLATION

 

 

Bill Type

1995

60 Days

1996

30 Days

1997

60 Days

1998

30 Days

1999

60 Days

2000

30 Days

2001

60 Days

Bills

2,395

1,656

2,692

968

1,729

1,041

1,860

Memorials, resolutions and requests

275

245

252

1,261

2,189

1,843

4,688

Total

2,670

1,901

2,944

2,229

3,918

2,884

6,548

 

As indicated in the tables above, the Legislature tends to propose more bills in 60-day sessions than in 30-day sessions.  In 30-day sessions the number of bills introduced that would be under the purview of the proposal generally fall below the limit imposed by the proposal.  In 60-day sessions, the bills are more than the limit imposed by the proposal; there may be some savings in 60-day sessions, although it is undeterminable at this time.

 

QUESTSIONS

 

1.   Does the sponsor intend to limit introduction of “bills” only or does the sponsor intend to include memorials, joint memorials, resolutions, joint resolutions and concurrent resolutions in the limitation?

 

DKB/ar


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.