[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Sanchez |
DATE TYPED: |
02-8-02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Relating to Retirement for Adult Correctional
Officers |
SB |
195 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Neel |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
See
Narrative |
|
Non-Recurring |
Public Employee Retirement Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
LFC files
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 195 amends
statute to take adult correctional officers out of
retirement plan State Hazardous Duty Plan 2 and puts them into State Police
Member Coverage Plan 1. SB 195 also
requires that a vote be held of adult correctional officers to approve the
adoption of the proposed change.
Significant
Issues
According to PERA provision in SB 195 would increase the service credit for adult correctional officers by 20%. The 20% enhanced service credit means that for every year served, members receive 1.2 years of service credit. The members in the plan are eligible to retire after 20 years and 10 months. The employee contributions in the proposed State Police/Correctional Officer Plan would be the same as that currently paid by the State Police. The adult correctional officers contributions (employee) would increase from 4.78% of salary to 7.6%. The employer, contributions are slightly reduced from 25.72% of salary to 25.1%.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
SB 195 does not
contain an appropriation, however, PERA’s Actuaries
studied the benefits that are provided in SB 195 and stated that “internal
sources of funding” is a reasonable approach to funding the 20% enhanced
benefit for the adult correctional officers.
“Internal sources of funding” are proportional assets currently in the
State Hazardous Duty Plan 2 that would be transferred to the State Police Plan
to fund past benefits for the affected members who have earned service credit
in State Hazardous Duty Plan 2.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
PERA will be required to conduct the election for affected membership on the plan change and would be required to perform administrative function requiring the creation of a new retirement plan.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
PERA notes the
following:
The increase in
contributions (from Hazardous Duty Plan 2 to State Police Plan 1) will fund the
enhanced future benefits created for adult correctional officers in SB
195. However, it is the past service
credit that will need additional funding.
PERA’s most recent actuarial cost determination stated that as of June
30, 2000, the cost of past benefits (to provide all past service credit earned
in Hazardous Duty Plan 2 by adult correctional officers) was $15,746,609 lump
sum or an additional contribution increase of 8.33% over the current rate in
State Police Plan 1. Nonetheless,
PERA’s Actuaries went on to state that since Hazardous Duty Plan 2 enjoys a
strong financial position, it is reasonable to fund past service credit
enhancement with a pro-ration of assets and liabilities of the affected employees. If SB 195 is enacted and no additional
funding sources, PERA will take steps to ensure that the changes will not
affect the viability of State Police Members in State Police Plan 1.
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.