[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Fidel |
DATE TYPED: |
02/09/02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Capital Outlay Projects |
SB |
358 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Kehoe |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
NFI |
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates
to HB 88
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 358 reauthorizes previous years capital outlay appropriations by changing the purpose of a project, extending reversion dates, changing the grantee or broadening language to clarify the purpose of the project.
Significant
Issues
The reauthorization process is used to amend capital outlay projects funded in previous years. The amendments may include a change of purpose or language, an extension of the reversion period, or a change of the grantee. Traditionally, reauthorizations have been included in a section at the end of the capital outlay bill. However, as was the case in 1997 and again in 2001, if the capital bill is vetoed, reauthorized projects cannot move forward for another year, or the funding for the project may revert.
Senate Bill 358 contains all reauthorizations
requested by members of the Senate and Executive agencies in the 2002
Legislative Session.
RELATIONSHIP
The capital outlay bill traditionally originates in the House. If Senate Bill 358 is not amended to include the reauthorizations requested by members of the House of Representatives, it is expected the House reauthorizations will be amended into a section in the back of House Bill 88.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Other capital
projects that may be considered in separate legislation may include projects
appropriated from “other funds” such as Miner’s Trust Fund, Game Protection
Fund, Irrigation Water Construction Fund, and projects driven by state
compacts, such as the Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Railroad.
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.