[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Maes |
DATE TYPED: |
02/05/02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Amend Workers’ Compensation Act |
SB |
357 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Woodlee |
|||||
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation
Contained |
Estimated
Additional Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
||
FY02 |
FY03 |
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
$0.1 Indeterminate |
Recurring |
OSF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parenthesis
( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Workers’ Compensation Administration
SUMMARY
Synopsis
of Bill
Senate Bill 357 amends
the Workers’ Compensation Act to provide that the provisions of the Act apply
to employers engaged in activities required to be licensed pursuant to the
provisions of the Construction Industries Licensing Act regardless of the
number of employees unless the employer employs: 1) only one employee
who is a clerical worker who does not engage in employment activities on a
construction work site and the employer is a sole proprietorship, or 2) two
employees, one of whom is a clerical worker who does not engage in employment
activities on a construction work site and the other of whom is an officer or
principal of the business entity engaged in activities required to be
licensed.
Significant
Issues
The Workers’ Compensation Administration has
concerns that the provisions in the bill will cause an increase in the number
of required field visits to employers who will claim to fall within the scope
of the proposed exceptions to the application of the Workers’ Compensation Act
because there will be those employers who will attempt to avoid workers’
compensation insurance under the broadened exceptions. Additionally, WCA is concerned with a
conflict with the next section of the Workers’ Compensation Act that defines
“sole proprietor” (see Conflicts/Relationship section).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no
appropriation or significant fiscal implication associated with this bill.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The Workers’ Compensation Administration has expressed concern that the provisions in this bill will create the need for additional compliance inspections due to the increased number of employers who will claim to fall under the scope of the exceptions provided.
CONFLICT/RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 357 creates a conflict by providing
for an exception to the Workers’ Compensation Act for employers who only employ
one clerical worker and is a sole proprietor.
The next section of the Act (52-1-7) defines sole proprietor as “a
single individual who owns all the assets of a business, is solely liable for
its debts and employs in the business no other person than himself.”
Senate Bill 357 relates to Senate Bill 414,
which appropriates funds to conduct a study on recent court decisions or other
issues related to the Workers’ Compensation Act. Additionally, the bill relates to Senate Joint Memorial 24, which
requests an interim committee to study the workers’ compensation system.
MW/njw
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.