[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Cisneros

 

DATE TYPED:

2/2/02

 

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE:

Taos Teen Court Program

 

SB

320

 

 

ANALYST:

J. Sandoval

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

$55.0

 

 

Recurring

General Fund

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

Duplicates       HB376

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC files

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 376 appropriates $55.0 from the general fund to Local Government Division of the Department of Finance and Administration for the purpose of funding the Taos county DWI-teen court program.

 

     Significant Issues

 

  1. For FY02, an appropriation totaling $55.0 was made to the 8th Judicial district court in Taos to fund the teen court program.  The court did not request this funding and did not want the responsibility of teen court.  As a result, the 8th Judicial District court did not request continued funding for this program in its FY03 budget request.
  2. For FY03, the Legislative Finance Committee also recommended eliminating funding for teen court in the 3rd and 5th districts courts.  Teen court exists in other jurisdictions around the state, but is funded by either the county or municipality in which it operates.  The LFC does not believe teen court is a function that the state should permanently fund although it acknowledges the merits of the program’s goal.  Start-up funding has been provided by the state to the three districts mentioned, but the expectation is that counties, schools, volunteers, municipalities or other community-based organizations will provide continued support for teen court programs.
  3. Teen court is a program designed for firs-time offenders to keep their records clean.  A jury, composed of local teens, does not decide innocence or guilt of an offender, but assesses the sentence of the offender.  The offender must openly admit commission of a delinquent act in front of the teen jury.  If the offender admits to a delinquent act, accepts the “sentence” of the teen jury and successfully completes it, then the delinquent act is dismissed and the offender pays no fine.
  4. It is, perhaps, the local municipal courts who are the most appropriate to fund and administer teen court programs.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The appropriation of $55.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2003 shall revert to the general fund.

 

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

 

  1. Why is funding being requested by the state for a county-sponsored program? 
  2. Since the state provided Taos county with start-up money, why is the county requesting continued funding?

 

CMS/JS/njw

 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.