[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Jennings

 

DATE TYPED:

02/09/02

 

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE:

Prescriptive Authority to Psychologists

 

SB

300

 

 

ANALYST:

J. Sandoval

 

REVENUE

 

Estimated Revenue

Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

$4.5

$9.0

Recurring

Other State Funds

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)

 

Duplicates House Bill 305

Relates to House Bill 170 and Senate Bill 231

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 
LFC files

 

Responses Received From

Health Policy Commission

Department of Health

Regulation and Licensing Department

Attorney General’s Office

 

SUMMARY

 

Senate Bill 300 amends the New Mexico Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, to include “prescribing psychologist” in the category of practitioner.  The Controlled Substances Act is amended to add “prescribing psychologist” to the definition of practitioner.  The Nursing Practice Act is amended to add “prescribing psychologist” to its definition of licensed practical nursing.  The Professional Psychologist Act is amended to include a “conditional prescription certificate” that would be issued by the Board of Psychology that would permit the holder to prescribe psychotropic medication under the supervision of a licensed physician.  Psychotropic medication is defined as “a controlled substance…that may not be dispensed or administered without a prescription and whose primary indication for use has been approved by the federal food and drug administration for the treatment of mental disorders…”.  A new section of the Professional Psychologist Act would be created which defines how a psychologist is trained, supervised, credentialed, and maintains a “conditional prescription certificate”.

 

 

 

     Significant Issues

 

According to the Department of Health, this bill would make New Mexico the first state to allow a psychologist to prescribe psychotropic medications after successfully completing pharmacological training from an institution of higher education or from a provider of continuing education approved by the Board.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

  1. The New Mexico State Board of Psychologist Examiners (the board) recommends adding an additional board member who has advanced training in psychopharmacology to the State Board of Psychologists Examiners to assist with the review of the application procedures, rules and regulations.  If such a candidate is not added to the board, training for board members and/or the board administrator is advisable.  This training would cost $2.0.

 

2.     The drafting of rules and regulations, holding public hearings, publishing proposed rules, final adoption of rules and regulations and printing costs will come to approximately $3.0.

 

  1. Appointing a subcommittee to work and review applications of prescribing psychologists, and complaints, if any will cost $2.0.

 

  1. The board will need to be given additional budget authority of $7.0 to use fund balances to pay for these additional costs.  The board’s estimated fund balance for FY03 is $158.4.

 

  1. If the bill is successful, the estimated revenue will be approximately $4.0 annually.  This increase in revenue projection is based upon the current application fee of $0.3 and an estimate of approximately 15 candidates who will qualify under the conditional prescription certificate ($0.3 X 15 = $4.5).

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

 

The Department of Health would need to work with state and federal governments to create a system of malpractice insurance and reimbursement for the prescribing psychologist. In addition, the issue of certification of programs, which include psychologists prescribing medications for the mentally ill, would need to be addressed.

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

 

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

 

  1. How are the health and safety concerns of complex medical cases assured in this bill?
  2. How would a prescribing psychologist’s training compare to that of a prescribing medical doctor?
  3. Will the required training be sufficient in scope, content and clinical experience to insure the quality of care that is currently provided by other practitioners with prescribing authority?
  4. Will Psychologist trained in prescribing psychotropic medication increase accessibility to mental health care?
  5. Will there be significant cost savings to New Mexico residents?
  6. Will there be more options for patients in rural areas or areas where physician shortage exists?

 

JFS/prr


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.