[1]NOTE:
As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the
standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative
Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information
in this report when used in any other situation.
Only the most recent
FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative
Website. The Adobe PDF version includes
all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the
LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
SPONSOR: |
Smith |
DATE TYPED: |
2/06/02 |
HB |
|
||
SHORT TITLE: |
Resources and Processors Tax on Copper |
SB |
223 |
||||
|
ANALYST: |
Smith |
|||||
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue |
Subsequent Years
Impact |
Recurring or Non-Rec |
Fund Affected |
|
FY02 |
FY03 |
|
|
|
|
($990.0) |
|
Recurring |
General
Fund |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Taxation and Revenue Department
Synopsis of Bill
The proposal would extend reduced tax rates
under the resources excise tax on copper from June 30, 2002 through June 30,
2005. The reduced rate is 0.25 percent
of taxable value of the resource. The
higher rate would be 0.75 percent of taxable value. Taxable value is generally the gross sales value of the minerals
less royalties paid to the U.S. government, the State of New Mexico or a tribal
government
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD notes that the FY
2003 revenue impact reflects 11 months of revenue collections. The estimates presented here reflect the
current value of copper sales as reflected in monthly resource excise tax
collections. Collections have been
running at about $45 thousand per month for the last six months. At the reduced tax rate of 0.25%, this
translates into taxable value of about $18 million per month or $216 million
per year. If the tax rate is allowed to
increase to 0.75%, monthly revenue would increase to $135 thousand, an increase
of $90 thousand, or $1,080 thousand on an annual basis. Based on recent announcements by copper
producers in the state, it appears likely that the production volumes may be
declining over time if market conditions do not improve.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The
1999 Legislature reduced the rate of resources excise tax on copper from 0.75
percent to 0.25 percent in response to depressed prices for the commodity. At that time, prevailing copper prices were
about $0.65 cents per pound. Although
prices have risen at times since then to over $0.85 cents per pound, the
average price is currently about $0.70 per pound.
SS/njw
[1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode. Do not add or delete spaces.